Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Afghanistan to have strong air force by 2016: Azimi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Afghanistan to have strong air force by 2016: Azimi

    The Ministry of Defence said that Afghanistan would boost a strong air force to support their ground forces until 2016.
    During a joint video conference with Maj. Gen. Jim Ferron, the deputy commander of NATO training mission in Afghanistan, the Gen. Zahir Azimi told journalists that up to 350,000 Afghan security personnel are well trained and would maintain security of the whole country beyond 2014 and would independently conduct security operations.
    Azimi is currently in Brussels to attend the NATO foreign ministers meeting, where Afghanistan’s security would b e widely discussed.
    In response to a query from Pajhwok Afghan News, he said that Afghan air force would be capable to conduct air operation and support Afghan ground forces.
    “Talks with the US are underway and US promised to provide 150 different kinds of helicopters to Afghanistan,” he added.
    They have established a training centre in the Shindand district of western Herat province for the air force and many Afghan officers and soldiers had been sent to foreign countries for training, he added.
    Regarding the casualties of Afghan security personnel, he said that they have been working with the NATO-led forces to start joint efforts to reduction these casualties.
    The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) has been training national forces and has been cooperating with Afghan forces for defusing mines, he added.
    According to Azimi, currently 112 Afghan National Army soldiers and 200 policemen are being killed each month in Afghanistan.
    Another reason for the increasing causalities in Afghan forces was due to the handing over of 80 percent of security responsibilities to Afghan forces, he added.
    Good governance, political support, regional and international relations, support of the people for the security personnel could play a crucial role for maintaining peace in the Afghanistan, he concluded.
    Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar that the alliance would support the country to tackle the ongoing terrorism.
    "Most urgently, we need to remain united to defeat terrorism. At NATO we understand well that Pakistan has paid a high price in these efforts. The alliance stands together with you to combat this scourge, he said.
    Rasmussen added: "It's clear that the pursuit of peace and security in your region is in the interest of the broader international community. That includes peace in Afghanistan, where Pakistan has a particular role to play."

    BRUSSELS (PAN would boost a strong air force to support their ground forces until 2016. During a joint video conference with Maj. Gen. Jim Ferron, the deputy…
    Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

    A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

    For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


    The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

    -Ferishta, 1560–1620

  • #2
    its useless without real sovereignty
    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

    Sayyid Qutb

    Comment


    • #3
      If the US Air force cant do it, why should anyone expect an Afghan Air force to accomplish something the US Airforce could not.

      Comment


      • #4
        i think they are looking at an air force at a conventional usage, not fighting a guerrilla war. conventionally, whatever afghan air force that may take form in the near future will be useless. it can't fight the taliban if this war continues, khuda nakona, it will be completely useless against its neighbors because pakistan/iran simply have more money and better pseudo indigenous technology.
        There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

        Sayyid Qutb

        Comment


        • #5
          Great. Now we need Pakistan to return something back to Afghanistan that doesn't belong to them so we can have a navy.
          "Revenge is a dish best served cold".

          -Old Pashtun proverb




          "My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"

          Comment


          • #6
            pradaio rata jaara kra mong ta melee urdu....za ba deen watan satee dasse lanatee urdu
            High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by khushal View Post
              If the US Air force cant do it, why should anyone expect an Afghan Air force to accomplish something the US Airforce could not.
              The U.S. airforce can do it, but International Law prevents them.
              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

              Comment


              • #8
                They are there against international law.

                Comment


                • #9
                  international law was created by the biggest violators and the most imperialistic nations in the modern world. they are like afghanistan and its constitution, its like toilet paper if no one follows it.
                  There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                  Sayyid Qutb

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by randolph85 View Post
                    international law was created by the biggest violators and the most imperialistic nations in the modern world. they are like afghanistan and its constitution, its like toilet paper if no one follows it.
                    Most of what is International law has merit but the elite nations dont follow it. If international law was followed, the durand line would not exist.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What RTR meant was that the USAF could carpet-bomb whole Afghanistan or use non-conventional warheads and bombs and then the Taliban would be gone like in 2 weeks.

                      But such a tactic would a have political backlash.

                      Wars aren´t won´t militarily in modern times....
                      The only constant is change.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Mostafa1919 View Post
                        What RTR meant was that the USAF could carpet-bomb whole Afghanistan or use non-conventional warheads and bombs and then the Taliban would be gone like in 2 weeks.

                        But such a tactic would a have political backlash.

                        Wars aren´t won´t militarily in modern times....

                        Even if they do so,"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."
                        High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X