70% of Afghan women are raped via forced marriages

[faye]

dont follow me and harrass me
I will get you banned from this forum that you love sooo much

and who is the stalker that slimed onto my wall. reading my conversations with other members, did not reply when i asked you what you wanted there, and then copied my private conversation onto a thread???

like, pullleeeeeese. who is the real stalker and pervert here?

YOU..LYNX!!!!!!

you are so out of control, with no life, that you are perving around on members private chats and creating files. that is simply sad and pathetic and sly.

so, before making these accusations about others, take a good long look in the mirror and stop being a hypocrite and a liar.

[asad71]

And your report will be disregarded, seriously

Maybe I should call you Razakar....my Bangladeshi friend tells me that Pro-Taliban people in Bangladesh are Jamaat-i-Islami adherents whose predecessors had assisted Pakistan in systematic rapes of Bangladeshi women. They were called Razakars





This has nothing to do with rape though. In the West Murder is a criminal offense, and in Islam murder is a criminal offense, so does that make it no longer a criminal offense because the West says so?

Your logic is fraudulent; Usually Bengalis are better educated you have proven to be the failure of your culture.





.

Which again has nothing to do with rape. Your example is incorrect there is no alternate definition for the term "sexual acts"



Forced is pretty simple; NON-CONSENTUAL.

It's not that hard to figure out

REPORTING this for personal attack.

[khushal]

didn't see the link or just being deliberately obtuse again and pretending if you don't see it, it's not there?

http://www20.csueastbay.edu/director...ounosFarid.pdf

I saw the link, but it does not list the divorce rate of Afghan/pashtun in America. Its hard to believe your claim since I myself have heard of no Pashtun family in America that has had a divorce. They may exist but Ive never heard of it. Your claim of it being higher than the national average is irrational. I myself cant find any source to your claim so you must give me something other than a resume of some researcher who lists nothing about the claim you have made.
Even in Afghan/Farsiwan culture or Pakistani/indic culture where divorce is socially acceptable. Their divorce rate is not higher than the national average. Even the Arabs culture where divorce is easier than taking candy from a baby don't have a divorce rate higher than the national average either. I suggest you concede on this matter or provide evidence.

[JattApache]

Lynx = Ghundal = karpo = UNKNOWNPRINCE
The biggest TROLL EVER!!!!

[JattApache]

And your report will be disregarded, seriously

Maybe I should call you Razakar....my Bangladeshi friend tells me that Pro-Taliban people in Bangladesh are Jamaat-i-Islami adherents whose predecessors had assisted Pakistan in systematic rapes of Bangladeshi women. They were called Razakars





This has nothing to do with rape though. In the West Murder is a criminal offense, and in Islam murder is a criminal offense, so does that make it no longer a criminal offense because the West says

Your logic is fraudulent; Usually Bengalis are better educated you have proven to be the failure of your

Which again has nothing to do with rape. Your example is incorrect there is no alternate definition for the term "sexual acts"



Forced is pretty simple; NON-CONSENTUAL.

It's not that hard to figure out

Oh i see, our friend, asad, is a razakar, a traitor against his own people

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_atrocities

I support the bengali people, but not the razakar traitor like you

[khushal]

They have a choice to get drunk or intoxicated, and even rapes that happen in those instances, are small in comparison to rapes that happen from forced marriages.

In the end, they have the power to control how they act, if they don't act on it then they dont

Not really. If they are under the influence, they can not consent hence they are raped, this would put almost every American woman in the catagory.

[khushal]

heaven forbid that i should imagine i know anything about being female, westernised or alcohol consumption, khushal.
of course a muslim, male, sexist, chauvinist like yourself, and the dippy lynx, would know better. lol.

were you actually seriously expecting serious answers to these dumb questions, khushal?

ofcourse its a dumb question because you cant answer it. reminds me a first grader calling certain questions dumb because they cant answer it.

[khushal]

I like how you say Pastun women and children are dying due to NATO air strikes; and NOT to Taliban attacks, even though it's well known that taliban attacks are the primary cause of civilian deaths

The Taliban are indegenous, only the indegenous people have the right to handle them. Foreigners are not there for the indegenous peoples interest. If the indegenous peopel are killing each other, let them thats their problem not Americas. Eventually Nature will resolve the issue. the prime directive on non interference is the best policy.

[JattApache]

The Taliban are indegenous, only the indegenous people have the right to handle them. Foreigners are not there for the indegenous peoples interest. If the indegenous peopel are killing each other, let them thats their problem not Americas. Eventually Nature will resolve the issue. the prime directive on non interference is the best policy.

Yes but america don't care if they are indegeneous or not, they don't care

[Nima Khan Abdali]

People in Afghanistan die because of enmity of NATO and stupidity of Taliban. When you take all Pashtuns exactly as one side, then you'd be confused. Pashtuns individual thoughts may vary. Some Pashtuns believe this way and some others the other way; furthermore, they all think it is upon the Pashtun tradition what they do. For instance, the governing sub-clan of Pashtuns - Popalzai - has always brought external forces to settle things down, since they think it is the best way. That's why Hamid Khan sent for NATO. To him and his fellows, it was needy. To some others, it was needless.

30-35 years ago, Taliban came to existence: then they were necessary and useful and right simultaneously, since they could drive away the communism disease away of Pashtuns and the nation of Afghanistan. Lots of talib and mujahideen became martyrs for the sake of civilian Afghans. And they defeated Soviets. But today Taliban is not then Taliban. It's changed. Also the need for Taliban has changed.

Such things always exist in history of society: 400 years ago romantism in literature was needed and useful but 200 years from then, it became insufficient, and realism became needed. Same situation here. The needs of society change.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

REPORTING this for personal attack.

whatever you say Razakar.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

The Taliban are indegenous, only the indegenous people have the right to handle them. Foreigners are not there for the indegenous peoples interest. If the indegenous peopel are killing each other, let them thats their problem not Americas. Eventually Nature will resolve the issue. the prime directive on non interference is the best policy.

The Taliban acting as proxies have pretty much nullified the indigenous card

http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/News/ISI-paid-Taliban-to-kill-Indians-in-Kabul/Article1-578055.aspx

India has long believed Pakistan to be the puppet master behind attacks on Indian assets in Afghanistan in recent years. Among the 91,000 secret US documents released by the non-profit website Wikileaks in its ‘Afghan War Diary’ are reports that substantiate these claims. They confirm


Pakistan must stop using terrorism as policy instrument: India
Obama plays down intel leaks, says nothing new in Afghan docs
US asks Pak to take decisive action against terrorism
US now says Pakistani support for Taliban 'in the past'
earlier reports that there was intelligence of attacks on the Indian embassy in Kabul on July 7, 2008 and on other Indian targets.
They also say that the Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI) offered the Taliban $15,000-30,000 to kill Indian contractors in Afghanistan.

Many of the reports are drawn from the 2004-07 period, when Pakistan Army chief Gen Parvez Ashfaq Kayani — the man the US has depended on for its war on terror — ran the ISI. American officials often praise Kayani for what they call his efforts to purge the military of officers with ties to militants.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

The manipulation tactic is the same. If you build a brothel, bar, casino, religious institution for prayer(mosque or church depending on the religion the people practice in the neighborhood) down the street, most likely people will got to it whatever the establishment is. no matter what it is, if it is there people will got to it, if they do not, clever marketing will convince them. People are more stupid than you think. The Pharoh convinced people that he was God, The meccans convinced people to worship idols for protection that they themselves created. The Europeans convinced people that God created blacks to serve whites.
.

The fact you use the term "convince" instead of force pretty much blows your case out of the water. You don't need to convince anyone when you force them. Afghan women aren't "convinced" to marry 50 year old men, they're forced. If they were convinced to do it, we wouldn't be having this debate.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

REPORTING this for personal attack.

we know what you are, and i can understand why you're so confused on the rape issue given your origins

Razakars (Pakistan)

Not to be confused with Razakars (Hyderabad).
The Razakar (Bengali: রাজাকার) was the paramilitary force organized by the Pakistan Army during the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971.

The Urdu word razakar (رضا کار) literally means "volunteer". The Razakar force was composed of mostly pro-Pakistani Bengalis and Urdu-speaking migrants living in erstwhile East Pakistan (now Bangladesh)[1]. Razakars were allegedly associated with many of the atrocities committed by the Pakistan Army during the 9-month war (see 1971 Bangladesh atrocities).

[PashtunShinwari45]

we know what you are, and i can understand why you're so confused on the rape issue given your origins

And your origins as an AQ fundamentalist Arab imperializer is known to all... To many who saw you on other forums it is comical to watch you to try and reinvent yourself because of your fear of jail. You were and are biggest Taliban Panjab PURE Arab.