Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Buffalo can’t become a Lion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Buffalo can’t become a Lion

    Buffalo can’t become a Lion
    Mr. President Obama, how giant a buffalo might be it can’t become a lion by casting a vote of support thereto. Somalia is far better, may be supported for bringing her in the club of world big five, for Somalia unlike India is not sitting on UN Security Council Resolutions for more than 60 years in re: Kashmir!!!
    Mr. President Obama, you are worry about Burma, which is an independent country but you could not feel the least about Indian Brahmin Terrorism in the IHK and who martyred more than 80,000 Kashmiri men, women, & children thus far simply because Kashmiris want freedom!!!
    However, Mr. President Barack Obama, thanks to you & your country for calling spade a spade in Bharat speaking generally.

  • #2
    you are right

    Comment


    • #3
      Unknownprince,

      You need to educate yourself about China before posting rubbish. China is not only occupying the lands of East Turkestan [Xinkiang], Tibet and Inner Mongolia; but also pursued a policy of aggressive Hanification of these occupied nations so that the original inhabitants [Uighars, Tibetans, Mongolians] themselves have become a pitiful minority in their own lands. Before whorshipping Chinese, keep in mind that the Uighars are your fellow Muslims, and China has successfully used their Pakistani Rent Army for killing and oppressing the just struggle of these brave Muslims.

      Also China has had disputes/wars/tensions with all its neighbors.

      China is also propping up N. Korea, Mynamar and Pakistani regimes . Find out how the people of these failed countries are living and what kinds of rights do they have. Aside from the Military Elite of these countries, nobody benefits from their alliance with Chinese.

      Lastly, I am no fan of US imperialists but China stands nowhere near US. In 50 years she might, if she doesn't implode by then.
      Last edited by drona; 11-09-2010, 11:50 PM.
      Vande Mataram - Lata Mangeshkar - YouTube

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by unknownprince
        You will start to see other nations like Turkey, Iran, Brazil, and Venezuala gravitate towards China.

        In regards to Muslims, I do not know what this means, but China has never engaged in unjust wars with others, so history is in their favor.

        Obama's 2008 election victory war was little to late. And this drama he is putting on for the whole world has really exposed just how globally weak the US is, and how insignificant it has become.

        Next week, Obama welcome Castro to the White House to talk about working together on some issue jk jk

        All these actions are done to isolate China, but it will only backfire as anyone with half a brain can notice this.
        just go to sinkiang and tibet, one is muslim the other buddist, to see what is in store for you if you ever come under huan chinese athourity.

        Comment


        • #5
          China has still never participated in unjust wars.
          That's PRC propaganda. I would say that the war and occupation of East Turkestan, Tibetans and Inner Mongolia are mighty unjust.

          .. as is the war and quasi-occupation of North Korea.

          .. as is the war against tiny and fellow communist state of Vietnam [ who first defeated US and then Chinese]

          .. as was the war agaisnt India.

          There is a healthy balance of power in the world now.
          Presently, US is the sole hyper-power. The PRC commies got high on the good press they were getting in the West , abandoned their policy of "peaceful rise" and started to follow a more aggressive foreign policy viz-a-viz their neighbours [ India, S. Korea, Japan, Vietnam, etc] This has made all other Asian countries nervous [except failed/failing states like Pakista, N.Korea, Mynamar] and currently they are busy aligning themselves against China.

          Personally, I support a Multi-Polar world order. However, China's aggressive stance has made this very difficult.

          ~Drona
          Vande Mataram - Lata Mangeshkar - YouTube

          Comment


          • #6
            ndians are always too angry because they cant compete with china.

            You should check the history of Indian China war. LOL


            On 20 October 1962, the Chinese People's Liberation Army launched two attacks, 1000 kilometres apart. In the western theatre, the PLA sought to expel Indian forces from the Chip Chap valley in Aksai Chin while in the eastern theatre, the PLA sought to capture both banks of the Namka Chu river. Some skirmishes also took place at the Nathula Pass, which is in the Indian state of Sikkim (an Indian protectorate at that time). Gurkha rifles travelling north were targeted by Chinese artillery fire. After four days of fierce fighting, the three regiments of Chinese troops succeeded in securing a substantial portion of the disputed territory

            Angry with china not quite,but yes we r very careful in dealing with them.
            Remember the war u mentioned was after Nehru in height of naivety gifted china the security council seat in 1955 even after it was offered to us.
            The situation in south asia is very complex.Pak india tension,China supprting pak against india,us views india as counterbalance to china,but china now has billions of dollar of trade with us and is even involved in infra projects,india china against usa in Copenhagen,japan china tension ,japan investing heavily in india,japan pissed at USA supporting india for security council seat,damn i could go on and on.
            At the end i believe in geopolitics there r no permanent friends or foes.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by unknownprince
              Drona,

              If you are wearing Nike shoes right now, pick them up, and I bet you it says "Made in China." .
              Yep. With American Dollars !!
              It was US which strengthened China during the Cold War for hedging against USSR. After its collapse, China was supposed to follow the policy of "Peaceful Rise". However since this decade it has grown arrogant and now threatening all US allies [S.Korea, Japan, ASEAN countries]. Like I said, if China doesn't tow the US line, it will be punished. The Chinese export driven economy is booming on US/Japan/Korean investments, if these investments are diverted to another destination[like India], then the Chinese bubble will burst in a decade or two.
              Now the story of how that shoe was made is probably a very sad and tragic one involving a sweat shop, but the point Im trying to make is China is the new power. It has been known for a while, but political theorists just do not want to accept it publicly.
              Do a honest comparison between the Chinese and US GDP,the number of patents US has, the money the US spends on R&D, the Pentagon budget; and then tell me if China stands anywhere near US.

              I have opinions on those conflicts in China, but those are internal conflicts in China. .
              No they are not. China [the Han nation] ends at the Great Wall. E. Turkestan, Xinkiang and Tibet are oppressed nations.

              I never heard that China was at war with Vietnam. When did this happen?
              Enlighten yourself :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Vietnamese_War

              For example, it serves Afghanistan's interests to form trade and eventual military hardware contracts with China. China is not going to war with Afghanistan. There can be a pure business relationship that will benefit Afghanistan. My point is, in politics everyone serves their own interests. Unfortunately, no one ever does anything just because it is good to do.
              Of course, Afghanistan should have a beneficial relationship with China. After all its one of the most important countries in Asia. However, I would be very wary of getting too close to Panda, as it is known for supporting most genocidal regimes [ Khymer Rouge, Pyongyang,Mynamar,Sudan etc.]
              Last edited by drona; 11-10-2010, 07:48 PM.
              Vande Mataram - Lata Mangeshkar - YouTube

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by unknownprince
                Shadow Caster, your right, the way I see it, everyones been making us Pashtuns fight each other for their reasons, now let them all fight each other!!! China's emergence as a world power is very good news for those nations who want to develop without US-EU interference. If smart leaders emerge in Afghanistan, China is the country to sign military deals with.
                LoL !!

                The bestest pals of Pakistan Rent Army, their largest Arms suppliers, will help the emergence of a strong Afghanistan and in the process undo the Durand Line !!

                You don't need any Afghanistan leaders to deal with China. Once Taliban [Paki proxy] come into power, Afghanistan will already be in their control.

                Pakistan= China-proxy
                Taliban= Pakistan-proxy
                Therefore, Taliban= China-proxy^2

                China will probably dump some cheap toys, fake medicines and milk in Afghanistan in exchange for all those mineral resources.
                Vande Mataram - Lata Mangeshkar - YouTube

                Comment

                Working...
                X