If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Why is that?
Our mind is different because we ACKNOWLEDGE that someone is a human being although he might not be Pashtun? And, as usual, things have been quoted out of context and hence is why a question like this can even be asked.
If you read the whole conversation, this is how it goes:
A: XY won a medal for some sport.
B: Is he Pashtun?
A: He might not be Pashtun, but he still is a human being. =/
*B opens thread asking whether Pashtuns are human beings or not.*
Good explanation by you, I hope he understood!
Life is like posing for pictures. We pose the way we want to be seen by others. But stolen shots are better. They capture who we really are...
Then LZ is in agreement with Allah and viceversa. A Parsiwaan, a Tamil, a Sinhalese, a Jew or a Russian are neither better nor worse than you on the basis of their birth. Actions define whether you're "better" or "worse". However, that's not the purpose of my post.
A father loves his son more than he loves your son. Correct? Yes. Similarly, a Pashtun feels closer to another Pashtun than he does to a Yemenite or a Kazakh, correct? I'm sure everyone will agree except for a particular group that will say that they will get along with the one whose partug is worn above his ankles. They're another story altogether so let's leave them on their high camel in the desert and move on with our discourse.
Therefore, a Muslim Parsiwaan, just like a Muslim Baloch, might be a wonderful person. But he shares neither the linguistic, cultural, historical, blood, brotherly nor the let's-shake-hands-and-then-I-won't-let-go-of-your-fingers bond that Pashtuns share with each other, Durrand Line or no Durrand Line.
Pashtun unity does not base itself on hatred for Punjabis or Parsiwaans (most of whom are poor and decent human beings). However, we must know that just like for a father, his own son comes first, this is the case with our ethnic groups - a Baloch thinks about his kin first and so does a Tajik or an Uzbek. For them, Pashtuns come second. I'm not saying that by doing so, they're somehow evil and malevolent - this is just how it is. You think about your own family first. A Pashtun in Herat is closer, therefore, to another in Chitraal than he is to anyone else. That is what lar ao bar yo Afghan symbolizes.
If someone has "Muslim Ummah unity Khalifa Allahoakbar" in mind, I request them to wake up and smell the kavaa. It is something that never was and will never be. It's but a shadow and a dream. Lastly, Pashtun reunification is against the interests of both Parsiwaans and Punjabis - the former would become an insignificant minority if that happens while the latter would lose a productive colony. Pashtuns must understand this.
Lar ao bar ttol Pashtana yo di.
You are right but whatever you mentioned is totally not to the point, a father even go against his brother for his son who shares the same blood with him. Kindly read the original topic.
Life is like posing for pictures. We pose the way we want to be seen by others. But stolen shots are better. They capture who we really are...
leentoba...makwa...!
Sher malanga, der sha khbara kre de magar ta bia ba sa waye punjabi-pashtun bande?
Dalta khalaq wayi che punjabian kho musalman hm na di. Ta sa waye?
Parsiban-pashtun bande hech bartari na lari aw punjabi-pashtun bande?
Bia pakistani-afghanistani bande da Islam cherta zaii?
There are members who have thoughts like this but I don't share anything with them in this regard.
Life is like posing for pictures. We pose the way we want to be seen by others. But stolen shots are better. They capture who we really are...
Comment