Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Open Marriage Taught One Man About Feminism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Open Marriage Taught One Man About Feminism

    What Open Marriage Taught One Man About Feminism
    By
    Michael Sonmore

    As I write this, my children are asleep in their room, Loretta Lynn is on the stereo, and my wife is out on a date with a man named Paulo. It’s her second date this week; her fourth this month so far. If it goes like the others, she’ll come home in the middle of the night, crawl into bed beside me, and tell me all about how she and Paulo had sex. I won’t explode with anger or seethe with resentment. I’ll tell her it’s a hot story and I’m glad she had fun. It’s hot because she’s excited, and I’m glad because I’m a feminist.

    Before my wife started sleeping with other men, I certainly considered myself a feminist, but I really only understood it in the abstract. When I quit working to stay at home with the kids, I began to understand it on a whole new level. I am an economically dependent househusband coping with the withering drudgery of child-rearing. Now that I understand the reality of that situation, I don’t blame women for demanding more for themselves than the life of the housewife.

    Still, as a man, I could, if I wanted to, portray what I’m doing as “work,” and thus claim for myself the prestige men traditionally derive from “work.” Whenever I tell someone I stay home with the kids, they invariably say, “Hardest work in the world.” They say this because the only way to account for a man at home with the kids is to say what he’s doing is hard work. But there’s a subtext in the compliment that makes it backhanded: We both know no one ever says it to a woman. Mothers care; fathers provide care. The difference is crucial. Despite my total withdrawal from the economy and the traditional sources of masculine identity, I can still argue I am a provider. I provide care.

    In this way, my masculine self-image was stretched but not broken. Diaper bag notwithstanding, I was still a Man. It wasn’t until my wife mentioned one evening that she’d kissed another man and liked it and wanted to do more than kiss next time that I realized how my status as a Man depended on a single fact: that my wife ****ed only me.

    ***

    When people ask how it started, I say this: We married young. She’d had sex before me, but only with a handful of people a handful of times. She never had a boyfriend, never had a lover. I was the first man she ever had the chance to get to know intimately. By her mid-30s, having already had our children and entering her sexual prime, she felt keenly her lack of sexual experience. Happily for me, she was willing to talk about it, willing to ask if I’d be open to exploring other options. We opened a bottle of wine and started talking, and talking, and talking.

    She didn’t present it as an issue of feminism to me, but after much soul-searching about why the idea of my wife having sex with other men bothered me I came to a few conclusions: Monogamy meant I controlled her sexual expression, and, not to get all women’s-studies major about it, patriarchal oppression essentially boils down to a man’s fear that a woman with sexual agency is a woman he can’t control. We aren’t afraid of their intellect or their spirit or their ability to bear children. We are afraid that when it comes time for sex, they won’t choose us. This petty fear has led us as a culture to place judgments on the entire spectrum of female sexual expression: If a woman likes sex, she’s a ***** and a ****; if she only likes sex with her husband or boyfriend, she’s boring and lame; if she doesn’t like sex at all, she’s frigid and unfeeling. Every option is a trap.

    Feminism always comes back to sex, even when we’re talking about everything else. The point isn’t that all women should be sexual adventurers. Celibacy is as valid an expression of sexuality as profligacy. The point is that it should be women who choose, not men — even the men they’re married to. For my wife, the choice between honoring our vows and fulfilling her desires was a false choice, another trap. She knew how deep our love was, and knew that her wanting a variety of sexual experiences as we traveled through life together would not diminish or disrupt that love. It took me about six months — many long, intense conversations, and an ocean of red wine — before I knew it, too.

    When my wife told me she wanted to open our marriage and take other lovers, she wasn’t rejecting me, she was embracing herself. When I understood that, I finally became a feminist.

    ***

    That was two years ago, and today we’ve never been happier, more in tune, closer, tighter, stronger. Whatever power I surrendered, I don’t miss. I wouldn’t recommend it for everyone, but I tell everyone it works for us.

    How does it work? We take turns going out. Because we have small children (ages 6 and 3), one of us stays home. (We don’t like to use babysitters because it gives us a curfew; we’d rather go out unfettered than worry about turning into a pumpkin at midnight.) Going out alone to hooking up with others was an easy transition. It does work both ways and, yes, I too enjoy sexual carte blanche. I just don’t use mine as much as my wife uses hers. What’s important is equality of opportunity, not outcome.

    How does it feel? It feels great … mostly. Most of the time, it feels like a mature, responsible way to address our needs and desires within our loving, mutually supportive marriage. It feels very adult, especially because it depends on open, honest communication. We take great pride in all the talking we do. I meet a lot of people who say they’ll never get married because they don’t want to get divorced, and hearing it always makes me sad, because they are cutting themselves off from the possibility of the magic that happens when two people share their lives. People don’t divorce because they can’t stand sharing anymore; they divorce because they feel like they can’t share enough. I never forget that my wife is a whole person unto herself, a complete and dynamic individual, and though we are together, we’re not one. Too often people get trapped in the roles of husband and wife, and a gulf opens between what they think they should be and who they really are. Opening our marriage has allowed us to close that gap so that the person I call “wife” is the same person my wife sees in the mirror. Lying to each other begins with lying to yourself, and now we don’t have to lie to anyone.

    There are of course moments of jealousy, resentment, and insecurity. Recently, my wife went on a date and fell asleep at his apartment. I hadn’t heard from her since 10 p.m., she still wasn’t home at 6 a.m. My texts went unanswered and my calls went to voicemail. A tight knot of dread lodged in my stomach as I imagined all kinds of dire scenarios and realized that I not only didn’t know where she was, I had no idea whom she was with. I pictured myself going to the police saying, “I think she’s in Red Hook with a guy named Ryan. I don’t know his last name, but I think he’s a graphic designer?” I’m not sure there’s actually a word for the unique blend of acute terror and unforgivable shame I felt that morning imagining that I’d lost my wife to Ryan, the maybe graphic designer. When she finally texted me at 7:30 a.m., relief coursed through me like morphine. She wrote, “**************** Im soooooo sorry. Fell asleep.” I replied, “Just glad you’re ok, but next time, no radio silence. Remember: you’re not alone.”

    What surprises most people is when I tell them it’s not the sex-with-other-men that bothers me. The sex is the easy part, the fun part. It’s what the sex connects to, stands for, reveals that can be difficult. I don’t want her to fall in love with anyone else, and every time she goes on a date, I confront the possibility that she might. It happened at the beginning: The first person she dated after we opened up fell hard in love with her, and my wife, overwhelmed by his ardor, tried to love him back. Watching it happen, I was confused, angry, and terrified that she wanted to leave me. She assured me she didn’t, and whatever feelings she had for him didn’t lessen what she felt for me. Believing her then was the ultimate trust exercise. We survived because eventually I did believe her, and also because I learned to trust myself.

    This has been the great challenge of my open marriage: to draw strength from vulnerability. Doing so requires supreme self-confidence. You must first really, truly love yourself; it is the foundation upon which all the other love is built. From everywhere comes the message that what I’m doing is for weaklings, losers, failures, pussies; that if I had money and status, I could keep my wife “in line”; that her self-discovery comes at the expense of my self-esteem. My open marriage has made heavy demands on my ability to silence the voice of doubt in my head, that gnawing feeling of worthlessness. But I find I can meet those demands, and that I am able to build my self-confidence out of nothing more than the basic dignity we all possess. I’m grateful to my wife for pushing us to take this leap, and whatever happens to us in the future I would do it all again. And when she comes home tonight and crawls into bed beside me with a hot story about her date with Paulo, she’ll do it all again, too.
    "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
    I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

    -Ferdowsi.

  • #2
    Oh man, the decline of the West is unstoppable. Now being a cuck is a matter of pride and modernity. Thanks God they can't impose their liberalism on the rest of the world anymore.
    "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
    I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

    -Ferdowsi.

    Comment


    • #3
      They have lost the plot. lol. The rabbit hole goes even deeper than this, though. It's a never endning process.

      Comment


      • #4
        Equating open marriages to feminism....
        TFW to intelligent

        Comment


        • #5
          one good about our cultures is that we publicly shame cucks by words like dawoos and mordagow, which pushes them to the margins of society.

          Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


          Originally posted by ذو الفقار
          don’t try to be smart.

          Comment


          • #6
            not only whites, but also parsi and Brahmins are going to dye dogs death.

            whites were 23% at colonial period not long ago, but today they are just 8% and sharply declining.

            at one point in 19th century we were almost 6% of India's population. now we are at 2.5% and sharply declining. i am a single child and majority of Brahmin couples i know have only single or pair children.

            same with parsi people, you can fit total parsee population into eaden garden today while they formed majority under british bombay.

            today majority of Hindus from upper castes prefer to marry Sanskari naari/girls from village, where there is no such thing as feminism. (another option is tier 2 or 3 cities or UP and Bihar.)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
              one good about our cultures is that we publicly shame cucks by words like dawoos and mordagow, which pushes them to the margins of society.
              Every culture does that or did that.

              The author of the article is brainwashing his audience with myths rather than facts. The jealousy and control of a woman's sexuality comes from what evolutionary biologists call mate guarding. Since a man can never know if the child she is carrying is his, he must watch over her and protect her so he can make sure that his genes are passed. A woman on the other hand knows her child. The whole sexual revolution(controlling pregnancy and terminating pregnancy) and DNA testing put a wrench into people's biological impulses like this author's and tries to reason with it with his mumbo jumbo. We can now find out with DNA testing who is our child and who is not. A woman can now easily control if she wants to get pregnant or not. The consequences are already spreading to all parts of the world. Religions, which explained mate guarding and gave legal protection to it with marriages and vows are declining and are now labeled backwards.

              On a side note: Many in Hollywood and Bollywood have open marriages. If anyone out there has great respect for a certain actor, your respecting a dawoos/cuck.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by khushal View Post
                On a side note: Many in Hollywood and Bollywood have open marriages. If anyone out there has great respect for a certain actor, your respecting a dawoos/cuck.


                You're probably right but I don't really keep up with Hollywood. The only Hollywood actor(s) I really like are Christopher Walken, Christoph Walz and Dennis Hopper.

                I hope to God they aren't cucks ...would be disappointed.

                Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                don’t try to be smart.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by khushal View Post
                  Every culture does that or did that.

                  The author of the article is brainwashing his audience with myths rather than facts. The jealousy and control of a woman's sexuality comes from what evolutionary biologists call mate guarding. Since a man can never know if the child she is carrying is his, he must watch over her and protect her so he can make sure that his genes are passed. A woman on the other hand knows her child. The whole sexual revolution(controlling pregnancy and terminating pregnancy) and DNA testing put a wrench into people's biological impulses like this author's and tries to reason with it with his mumbo jumbo. We can now find out with DNA testing who is our child and who is not. A woman can now easily control if she wants to get pregnant or not. The consequences are already spreading to all parts of the world. Religions, which explained mate guarding and gave legal protection to it with marriages and vows are declining and are now labeled backwards.

                  On a side note: Many in Hollywood and Bollywood have open marriages. If anyone out there has great respect for a certain actor, your respecting a dawoos/cuck.
                  Ancient Indians were cucks though. Don't wanna post pics, but there are kamasutra temples all over South Asia proudly displaying their ancient cuckoldry as well as beastiality, and everything else perverted minds could think of. lol

                  It's funny how irrational, unnatural and immoral behaviors are being promoted as ''progressive'' / ''futuristic'' and a sign of ''advancement'' when in reality, primitive ancient people endorsed such behavior many places around the world. So what we have here is nothing ''new'' or ''progressive''. it's basically primitive behavior masked as ''progressive''.

                  What the West is undergoing now, I sense many ancient peoples experienced millenniums ago, but then something must have happened that led to the coming of the Abrahamic religions and other strict conservative monotheistic religions. I mean all of these books do declare that people lost their ways, indicating people had become perverted, and societies may have collapsed, since there was a need for someone (prophets) to arive and guide people in a different/healthy direction.
                  Last edited by Nertj; 09-30-2017, 12:31 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Nertj View Post
                    Ancient Indians were cucks though. Don't wanna post pics, but there are kamasutra temples all over South Asia proudly displaying their ancient cuckoldry as well as beastiality, and everything else perverted minds could think of. lol

                    It's funny how irrational, unnatural and immoral behaviors are being promoted as ''progressive'' / ''futuristic'' and a sign of ''advancement'' when in reality, primitive ancient people endorsed such behavior many places around the world. So what we have here is nothing ''new'' or ''progressive''. it's basically primitive behavior masked as ''progressive''.

                    What the West is undergoing now, I sense many ancient peoples experienced millenniums ago, but then something must have happened that led to the coming of the Abrahamic religions and other strict conservative monotheistic religions. I mean all of these books do declare that people lost their ways, indicating people had become perverted, and societies may have collapsed, since there was a need for someone (prophets) to arive and guide people in a different/healthy direction.
                    Modern Indians are cucks too. Most of them love it when a white man bangs an Indian Manjula girl. They feel "empowered" lol

                    "Progress" is by far one of the greatest hallmarks of the Western civilizations. The concept of things, societies and people in constance change its just amazing. Unfortunately nowadays Westerners have kinda lost their minds and they are victims of their own creations. Most of their social problems can not be addressed and fixed basically because they consider it "progress". Westerners believe that low birth rates, high divorce rates, high suicide rates, single moms, destruction of traditional family, individualism, hedonism, lack of values, lack of love or admiration for your country, people or community, are actually "good things". They are just digging their own graves and those retarded fools don't realize it.

                    I must say Lefties are mainly to be blamed here. Their obsession when it comes to destroying traditional Western values has been a total success. Western societies are broken and their people are literally dying off. But they just don't care!
                    "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
                    I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

                    -Ferdowsi.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Nertj View Post
                      Ancient Indians were cucks though. Don't wanna post pics, but there are kamasutra temples all over South Asia proudly displaying their ancient cuckoldry as well as beastiality, and everything else perverted minds could think of. lol

                      It's funny how irrational, unnatural and immoral behaviors are being promoted as ''progressive'' / ''futuristic'' and a sign of ''advancement'' when in reality, primitive ancient people endorsed such behavior many places around the world. So what we have here is nothing ''new'' or ''progressive''. it's basically primitive behavior masked as ''progressive''.

                      What the West is undergoing now, I sense many ancient peoples experienced millenniums ago, but then something must have happened that led to the coming of the Abrahamic religions and other strict conservative monotheistic religions. I mean all of these books do declare that people lost their ways, indicating people had become perverted, and societies may have collapsed, since there was a need for someone (prophets) to arive and guide people in a different/healthy direction.

                      The Rig Veda promotes marriage and moral perspectives on sexuality.
                      Your confusing the sexual practices of powerful elites with common people. This was and is common in all societies. Why do you think almost all pashtuns call people like Amanullah Khan and Zahir Shah mordagow and dawoos. Powerful elites in India had vast powers over the common folk and the caste system justified this inequality. They fooled the masses into thinking that the elites are on some moral highground when in reality they were at the bottom.
                      Last edited by khushal; 09-30-2017, 02:57 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
                        Modern Indians are cucks too. Most of them love it when a white man bangs an Indian Manjula girl. They feel "empowered" lol

                        "Progress" is by far one of the greatest hallmarks of the Western civilizations. The concept of things, societies and people in constance change its just amazing. Unfortunately nowadays Westerners have kinda lost their minds and they are victims of their own creations. Most of their social problems can not be addressed and fixed basically because they consider it "progress". Westerners believe that low birth rates, high divorce rates, high suicide rates, single moms, destruction of traditional family, individualism, hedonism, lack of values, lack of love or admiration for your country, people or community, are actually "good things". They are just digging their own graves and those retarded fools don't realize it.

                        I must say Lefties are mainly to be blamed here. Their obsession when it comes to destroying traditional Western values has been a total success. Western societies are broken and their people are literally dying off. But they just don't care!
                        The things you mention are products of a pampered society which is why through history elites have been "victims" of such immoral behavior.
                        You know the saying, power(money, being spoiled) corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely or our peoples version would be that a rich pampered man going to heaven is like taking a camel through the eye of a needle.
                        Last edited by khushal; 09-30-2017, 11:27 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          most of you dont know this but if you are from upper class of Kshatriya and dogra background, you can get invitation from hilly Regions of Himachal Pradesh and Uttrakhand to have sex with rajpts of lower status and knock their women up.

                          this ritual is the result of deep inferiority complex of Rajputs of hills, when north india was under terror from turks most of Rajputs from North
                          Rajasthan, haryana and punjab region migrated to Himachal pradesh and uttrakhanda in large numbers.

                          while these migrants displaced native kings and took over their lands and became kings. they saw these native kings inferior and refused to mix with them. but they liked white girls of these natives so they look them as 2nd wives.

                          majority of Hilly Rajputs are the product of these cross breeding and want to disassociate with their past. rajputs with rajwadi surnames consider themeselves superior but those native kings who look darker gets mocked as "gola" (mix breed, son of rakhile) so they actually invite light skinned rajputs and kshatriya tribes from Jammu region such as jamwals to sleep with their women so that their wives can give birth to pure white looking Native Child.

                          my friend whos jamwal Rajput helped one chautal bisht (native rajput surname) family since he was invited by them due to his skin and green eye color. baby from this ritual is light skinned as well and bisgt family parade him as kul deepak while my friend cant even see him as the part of agreement.
                          शूरबाहूषु लोकोऽयं लम्बते पुत्रवत् सदा ।
                          तस्मात् सर्वास्ववस्थासु शूरः सम्मानमर्हित।।
                          न िह शौर्यात् परं िकंचित् ित्रलोकेषु िवधते।
                          शूरः सर्वं पालयित सर्वं शूरे परितिष्ठ्तम ।।

                          Arms of the brave(kshatriya) always support and sustain the people like (a father his) son.
                          A brave(kshatriya) is, for this reason, honoured by all, in all situations.
                          [B][COLOR="Red"]There is nothing in all the three worlds, which is beyond (the reach of) bravery.[/COLOR][/B]
                          Brave/kshatriya sustains all, and all depend upon the brave.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            ^^^^ WTF did I just read?

                            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                            don’t try to be smart.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                              ^^^^ WTF did I just read?
                              lol. weird as hell. but he is probably right though.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X