Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Genetics thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Genetics thread

    In this thread I will posting news about genetics:

    Genetic study reveals Aetas and Indians share ancient ancestry



    A genetic link between Indians and two Aeta populations were unveiled in a study whose proponents include Frederick Delfin, university research associate at the DNA Analysis Laboratory in the University of the Philippines, Diliman.

    According to Delfin, it is commonly accepted that the Asia-Pacific—including the Philippines—was peopled by human migration that passed through the coast of South Asia.

    But the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Indian-Philippine genetic link that Delfin and his team found “can be a signal of shared ancestry that actually originated from India”.

    Two mtDNA sets, M52'58 and M52a, that both originate from Indian populations were found in the Aetas of Zambales and the Agtas of Iriga in the Philippines.

    These shared common haplogroups show a link between the populations of India and the Philippines that is about 5,000 to 20,000 years old. This suggests that these migratory groups from India arrived before the Austronesian people landed in Philippine shores and populated the prehistoric Philippine archipelago.

    Link found in female lineage

    Mitochondrial DNA or mtDNA are the parts of a person's genome passed on by mothers to their children; only women pass them from generation to generation.

    Common mtDNA haplogroups or specific lineages were found in some Philippine and Indian populations which suggest common origins between the two.

    Since mtDNA ancestry is matrilineal and not a combination of genetic material from both parents, tracing someone's lineage through the mtDNA is a somewhat straightforward process.

    Indian origins not found in other Southeast Asian groups

    This connection, science blogger Nathaniel Hermosa said, is noteworthy because it is unique to the Philippines.

    Established genetic studies showed that no such link has been found in other Southeast Asian groups.

    “We also studied about 1,700 other mtDNA genomes (samples or individuals) across the Asia-Pacific region and did not find these two haplogroups anywhere else,” Delfin said in an email interview with GMA News Online.

    Hermosa posed the question: “How did the people from South Asia travel to the Philippines without passing through the rest of Southeast Asia?”

    Other regions in Southeast Asia might have been undersampled in this study, he added.

    Delfin acknowledged this possibility, stating that, in reality, not all populations in the Asia-Pacific region have been studied. So other Southeast Asian haplogroups that could also share links to the Indian populations may not have been sampled yet.

    Another possibility, he says, is a phenomenon called “genetic drift” in which historical accidents—natural disasters, for example, like earthquakes or floods—wipeout entire populations, leaving lucky survivors. This means that the survivors pass on their genes largely as a result of chance rather than natural selection.

    Over time, the haplogroups that originated from India in other Asia-Pacific populations may have been eliminated, leaving only the ones observed between India and the Philippines.

    Arrival of migratory groups from India

    The same study also suggest “a genetic signal of a possible migration event that happened after the initial peopling of the Asia-Pacific region.”

    Somewhere between the initial peopling of Asia and Pacific regions and the Austronesian expansion, those migratory groups from India came to the Philippines.

    “This estimated age (5,000 to 20,000 years ago) is somewhat in between the estimated ages of the initial peopling of the Asia and Pacific regions (50,000 to 70,000 years ago) and the Austronesian expansion (5,000 to 7,000 years ago),” said Delfin.

    The latter are thought to be the two major peopling events of the Philippines.

    “Somehow after the ancestors of Asia-Pacific peoples first settled the region, there were subsequent population movements around the Asia-Pacific, that could have brought such Indian specific mtDNA haplogroups to the Philippines' prehistoric archipelago,” Delfin explained.

    Calls for further study

    Further investigation of this data will be done through an on-going project that focuses on different Negrito groups using autosomal single nucleotide polymorphism (aSNP) data, which unlike mtDNA data, is not limited to the female lineage and represents more the entirety of a person's genome.

  • #2
    These are Aetas, the original population of Philippines, they are related with Indian/South Asian Mtdna

    Comment


    • #3
      Geneticists identify first Indians



      Who were the first Indians? And where did they come from?
      Geneticists from the Madurai Kamaraj University claim they have found the answers in a small village called Jyothimanickam on the fringes of the Western Ghats, some 50 km from Madurai.
      Thirteen people in this hamlet carry the gene ‘M130’ in their DNAs and researchers from the university claim their ancestors were the first ‘Indians’.
      The investigations were carried out as part of research collaboration with the University of Oxford.
      “Gene M130 is the marker of the first human migration that took place in India some 70,000 years ago,” Ramsamy Pitchappan — professor emeritus in the department of immunology of the university — told HT.
      Gene mutations are key to tracing human history because with the help of mutations that has built up on the one surviving copy, geneticists can arrange people in lineages and estimate the time of origin of each lineage.
      They normally use two well-known benchmark programmes — “Dau Statistics” and the “Arlequin” software — to calculate the age of a mutated gene.
      “There is no other marker older than M130 in India. This way we have been able to identify the first human settlers in India, who obviously came out of Africa. Because all later migrations do not have his marker, it is evident that they were the first ‘Indians,’” he said.
      His findings are being presented on Discovery Channel’s new six-part series The Story of India starting April 16, he added.
      Pitchappan and his team first found the gene marker ‘M130’ in a person called Virumandi when they tested the DNA of some tribal villagers to get clues about human migrational history.
      The findings also serve as strong evidence that the rest of the world may have been populated from India. There is already a growing view among geneticists that South Asians populated the rest of world



      Geneticists identify first Indians | india | Hindustan Times
      Last edited by Karachi; 07-22-2017, 03:44 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        [MENTION=20109]miniskit[/MENTION] see you're not Aryans

        Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


        Originally posted by ذو الفقار
        don’t try to be smart.

        Comment

        Working...
        X