Retardness in the Muslim world.

[DSM0305]

Some times we should see what is said NOT who has said it. Do you have any problem with the contents of the article or with the source? This is the problem of those who only goes for Authority and take every thing as gospel truth if said by some one of higher credibility. This is what happens in religion. Everything in Quran or Hadith is true because come from good source.

Science discourages this trend as in science we do not have who says but we observe , verify and conclude. Open for all , no source is required.

Badlun, of all the people, I would have never thought you would said this... before I thought you were a man of science and not just Islam criticizer. Yet today, you have proven otherwise.

In science, the most important thing is the source. Imagine if a person claims that the earth got 5 moons. Would one believe him? obviously not. One will take a hard stand and demand a source for his claim. The same concept goes in everything, especially in science.

Science demands a scientific source for every claim a person makes. Now tell me, how many claims have this article have and how many source did it provide for its claim.

[DSM0305]

That s not true genetic deseas were always there, its just the people were not that advanced to detect them, but it is a common fact that marrieng in the family is actualy not good, chances on retard children is big. Ignoring the proof doesn't make the problems go away.

I don't know if you have researched it, but percent wise the increase is way to minimal.

And Ghumbasa is telling the truth. Genetic disease have increase due to radiation and chemicals.

Brother, you need to research these things more clearly before making big accusations and post article like this. I can tell you from this article that it is directed towards immigrants in the west. Which means it directed toward you, Badlun and other immigrants who lives in the west. I myself live in Scandinavia and have learn to read between the lines, when people like him post articles like this. You be surprised on how much of this article is a political post, and how far from actual science.

[Badlun]

Badlun, of all the people, I would have never thought you would said this... before I thought you were a man of science and not just Islam criticizer. Yet today, you have proven otherwise.

In science, the most important thing is the source. Imagine if a person claims that the earth got 5 moons. Would one believe him? obviously not. One will take a hard stand and demand a source for his claim. The same concept goes in everything, especially in science.

Science demands a scientific source for every claim a person makes. Now tell me, how many claims have this article have and how many source did it provide for its claim.

You misunderstood me. Science does not believe in authority but works with verifiable facts after observstios with senses and conducting experiments. This can be done by any one. No need of a prophet or religious sacred text to prove things.

Source is only describing what was proved by whome and how which can be done by any one. But if Newton says something not verifiable by any one cannot become law because it was said by him.
And I am critic of Islamism not Islam.

[ghumbasa]

You misunderstood me. Science does not believe in authority but works with verifiable facts after observstios with senses and conducting experiments. This can be done by any one. No need of a prophet or religious sacred text to prove things.

Source is only describing what was proved by whome and how which can be done by any one. But if Newton says something not verifiable by any one cannot become law because it was said by him.
And I am critic of Islamism not Islam.

Sience too is saying the same that genetic disease incidence is increased in recent years...You fail to present the proofs that genetic diseases were more in past than in today.