Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Interesting Live Debate Between Afghanistan and Pakistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Khostai View Post
    Make-up, besides diamonds, are the girls second best friend.

    Source: My female teacher
    Lol, I don't think so. The ones that have Pashtun admixture are quite pretty.
    "Do not waste water even if you were at a running stream."-Prophet Muhammad (SAW)

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Joey_Gladstonezai View Post
      Is it just me or are the Pakistani girls really beautiful, the host and the one doing the questions and answers at the end? Or maybe as an American guy, I just think they are exotic-looking and you may find them ordinary.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Joey_Gladstonezai View Post
        Is it just me or are the Pakistani girls really beautiful, the host and the one doing the questions and answers at the end? Or maybe as an American guy, I just think they are exotic-looking and you may find them ordinary.
        I disagree.
        "Revenge is a dish best served cold".

        -Old Pashtun proverb




        "My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"

        Comment


        • #19
          How come?
          "Do not waste water even if you were at a running stream."-Prophet Muhammad (SAW)

          Comment


          • #20
            I dont know whats so awesome about Amarallah Saleh. He is about as hypocritical as they come. He states that both Afghanistan and Pakistan are occupied countries hence puppet governments so according to his logic the only legitimate fighter in the region is hakimallah massood?

            So the ones that said Saleh is awesome or is in love with him, are you guys hakimullah massood supporters because it seems to me Saleh is, according to his statements in the debate or are you guys in love with a hypocrite.
            Last edited by khushal; 03-26-2013, 03:03 PM.

            Comment


            • #21
              ^Lol, that's what I was thinking too.
              "Do not waste water even if you were at a running stream."-Prophet Muhammad (SAW)

              Comment


              • #22
                Amrullah speaks pashto when he needs to. There is an interview on youtube easy to find.
                Amrullah despises pakistan bcz he claims that pakistani (isi) support militants (طالب) those who are pashtun, and that upsets the balance, amrullah, it appears, clearly doesnt want power legacy to be with pashtuns, thinking this might be his moment (dream on).
                His vitriole to pakistan is quiet acidic and he smugly reiterates the discovery of عصامه in kakul, although i thought it was abbotabad near PMA, and the salt on the wound is because he had estimated the aforementioned celebrity's possible hideout and given that info to gen.mush, who rejected it through his pan stained teeth. Of course he irks the pakistanis because he hits em on the gonads, even with a cricket box they cannot defend amrullah's blows. In a blinkered way, his foreign policy stance against pakistan may excite emotions of love and admiration, but in regards to internal affairs of afghanistan, amrullah is articulate but his loyalty is harder to grasp. Look here he is sittong with his colleague, both share a bad taste in their mouth in dealing with krazai, so he picks his side kicks.
                I was also wondering how readily he acknowledged the joint occupation of afghanistan and pakistan when both have quite different modus operendi, having said that have you heard the new today that national unity alliance opposes krazai signing any pacts with americans for proposed futures american bases in afghanistan.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by torkham View Post
                  Amrullah speaks pashto when he needs to. There is an interview on youtube easy to find.
                  Amrullah despises pakistan bcz he claims that pakistani (isi) support militants (طالب) those who are pashtun, and that upsets the balance, amrullah, it appears, clearly doesnt want power legacy to be with pashtuns, thinking this might be his moment (dream on).
                  His vitriole to pakistan is quiet acidic and he smugly reiterates the discovery of عصامه in kakul, although i thought it was abbotabad near PMA, and the salt on the wound is because he had estimated the aforementioned celebrity's possible hideout and given that info to gen.mush, who rejected it through his pan stained teeth. Of course he irks the pakistanis because he hits em on the gonads, even with a cricket box they cannot defend amrullah's blows. In a blinkered way, his foreign policy stance against pakistan may excite emotions of love and admiration, but in regards to internal affairs of afghanistan, amrullah is articulate but his loyalty is harder to grasp. Look here he is sittong with his colleague, both share a bad taste in their mouth in dealing with krazai, so he picks his side kicks.
                  I was also wondering how readily he acknowledged the joint occupation of afghanistan and pakistan when both have quite different modus operendi, having said that have you heard the new today that national unity alliance opposes krazai signing any pacts with americans for proposed futures american bases in afghanistan.
                  yes this is my issue with him. his stance against pakistan is admirable but its obvious he is firmly in the panjsheri camp, strictly concerned with keeping pashtuns out of power

                  i trust him as far as i can spit

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Well the there was a big difference in selection of panels, on Pakistan side you had parties who oppose each other's view and thats fine but atleast in some way you have one former representative of each department.

                    However on the Afghan side there were two guys and they are both the same party, to make this debate fair there should have been atleast one guy who could represent the taliban perspective. After all how can you talk about the roadmap for Afghanistan without having a single representative from the taliban ? its a kabul vs Pakistan debate to be honest with poor choice of commentators on Pakistani side.
                    It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by KGODB View Post
                      yes this is my issue with him. his stance against pakistan is admirable but its obvious he is firmly in the panjsheri camp, strictly concerned with keeping pashtuns out of power

                      i trust him as far as i can spit
                      What admiration? The hypocrite was happily getting aid from Pakistan in the past and currently from Russia, Iran, and US. His only issue with Pakistan is that they aid his obstacle to power.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Talal View Post
                        Well the there was a big difference in selection of panels, on Pakistan side you had parties who oppose each other's view and thats fine but atleast in some way you have one former representative of each department.

                        However on the Afghan side there were two guys and they are both the same party, to make this debate fair there should have been atleast one guy who could represent the taliban perspective. After all how can you talk about the roadmap for Afghanistan without having a single representative from the taliban ? its a kabul vs Pakistan debate to be honest with poor choice of commentators on Pakistani side.
                        Dont worry Talal, they are all idiots.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X