Tweet
It's misspelt deliberately.
I often see members label other members with the تالپ و تالپان epitaph. I despair because a generalised name given to someone is careless and worst defamatory - which of course leads to embarrasing insults.
Unless one makes a direct reference to espousing the values of the aforementioned movement, one cannot throw the epitaph at them
Unless, one shares the major points of the aforementioned movement, you cannot label them
Unless one clearly observes the majority of the practices of the movement, you cannot label them . . . .
Unless you have seen it with your own eyes, heard with your own ears, it is nothing short of hearsay and gossip, if you start labelling someone. What must you see or hear with your senses? Sufficient evidence that can back your claim (ideally in a court) in company of respected peers.
Members have range of views that stem from from idealism, realism to down right ignorance. The views could be commitment to faith, culture, values, their interpretations and experience. Some are misguided, so have misunderstood, some have deviated due to the influence of their environmental influences and others are ignorant. Each one can lay claim to a view, even set of views without eligibility of the movement تالپان
I lived amongst those who were bona fide تالپ , pious, decent, educated, yet they clearly differ with other who I also know who are labelled تالپ yet are bunch of dirty smelly قصابي heathens.
I often see members label other members with the تالپ و تالپان epitaph. I despair because a generalised name given to someone is careless and worst defamatory - which of course leads to embarrasing insults.
Unless one makes a direct reference to espousing the values of the aforementioned movement, one cannot throw the epitaph at them
Unless, one shares the major points of the aforementioned movement, you cannot label them
Unless one clearly observes the majority of the practices of the movement, you cannot label them . . . .
Unless you have seen it with your own eyes, heard with your own ears, it is nothing short of hearsay and gossip, if you start labelling someone. What must you see or hear with your senses? Sufficient evidence that can back your claim (ideally in a court) in company of respected peers.
Members have range of views that stem from from idealism, realism to down right ignorance. The views could be commitment to faith, culture, values, their interpretations and experience. Some are misguided, so have misunderstood, some have deviated due to the influence of their environmental influences and others are ignorant. Each one can lay claim to a view, even set of views without eligibility of the movement تالپان
I lived amongst those who were bona fide تالپ , pious, decent, educated, yet they clearly differ with other who I also know who are labelled تالپ yet are bunch of dirty smelly قصابي heathens.
Comment