Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Michio Kaku insinuates Newton's"Principia" is more important than Qur'an

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    But the technology was always there, that was not the variable that changed. The variable that changed was different economic priciples being applied.

    Comment


    • #32
      well even if that was so that technology was due to an understanding of physics, I never suggested it had to change variables, just that physics set the stage for it

      it all goes back to physics
      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

      Comment


      • #33
        But you could have the same knowldege in physics which was the case, India had it, China had it, The Soviets had it and the Amreicans had it. But the winners from those societies was the one that applied the best economic principles and the losers changed when they also changed their economic principles. They didnt change their knowldege of physics, they had it all along.

        Look at Empires. They rise and fall because of economics.

        Comment


        • #34
          Look at it this way. If you have the knowledge in physics, without the economic support, that knowldege is meaningless which is what happened during the transformation in China and India.

          Comment


          • #35
            BUT Physics drives it ..regardless; however in this situation that isn't the case, so not only does your argument fail in either situation; it was false on a factual level too.

            heck even from new technologies building infrastructure for the economy in general THAT is driven by Physics

            you're really a dumb person ....stop ...just stop. save your dignity if you have any left.
            [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

            2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

            Comment


            • #36
              rather if you have an economy without knowing how to build infrastructure for it, your economy fails, ...so physics drives economics.
              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

              Comment


              • #37
                Your wrong. One can argue that building infrastructure is driven by economics.

                The people with the best knowledge in physics are drawn to the societies with the best economic principles. Thats why the Soviets, Chinas, and India's best engineers were coming to the US.

                Your the one who is too dumb to understand that everyone is opening doors to China is because they changed their economic principles not because they changed their laws of physics you dumbass.

                Comment


                • #38
                  You're* (you make this grammar mistake often, at first I thought it was a typo until you kept doing it)

                  those best economies became the best due to physics so yes obviously because those economies were based on applying physics and thereby would create a sufficient environment for it.

                  thanks for proving my point YOU basically handed this to me.
                  [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                  2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                    rather if you have an economy without knowing how to build infrastructure for it, your economy fails, ...so physics drives economics.
                    So china is learning to build things because they all of a sudden learned physics. Dumbass, they had that knowldege all the time. They changed their economic principles and then everything automatically happened. Everyone opend their markets to them.

                    Stop embarrassing yourself.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      no Khushal ..straw-man again, they have been learning physics, not "all of a sudden" .; i their work is paying off now. hence driven by physics.

                      why is this so complicated for you to understand? Is your ego that wounded that you can't accept simple logic?
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                        You're* (you make this grammar mistake often, at first I thought it was a typo until you kept doing it)

                        those best economies became the best due to physics so yes obviously because those economies were based on applying physics and thereby would create a sufficient environment for it.

                        thanks for proving my point YOU basically handed this to me.
                        Youre not adding anything new to the argument because youre stuck, you cant answer back.
                        Youre not understanding that they had the knowldege in physics. It were the Soviets that went to space first, so actually they were ahead of the Americans in physics but it was econmic principles that ruled who the winner was.
                        Last edited by khushal; 12-18-2012, 02:49 AM.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          there's nothing to add ....your premise is wrong, a wrong premise is a wrong premise, no matter how many times you redress it. yeah they had the knowledge and? that Kniowledge was put to use and it's NOW paying off ...what's so hard to grasp here? do you need a pop-up book to help you ..a diagram?
                          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                            there's nothing to add ....your premise is wrong, a wrong premise is a wrong premise, no matter how many times you redress it. yeah they had the knowledge and? that Kniowledge was put to use and it's NOW paying off ...what's so hard to grasp here? do you need a pop-up book to help you ..a diagram?
                            That knowldege was always put to use. It only paid off when they changed their economic principles so in conclusion economics is the variable that drives humanities destiny more. Just like you this Kaku is Cookoo.

                            Once again you have been made a fool.

                            Comment


                            • #44


                              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Here you go dumbass Even Kaku basically says what I am saying therfore contradicting himself. People get the H1B because of economics:

                                Dr. Michio Kaku America Has A Secret Weapon - YouTube

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X