Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US held 200 teenagers as Afghan 'enemy combatants' - report

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 9
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 9 template Next
  • #1

    US held 200 teenagers as Afghan 'enemy combatants' - report

    Friday, December 14, 2012

    Afghanistan: US held 200 teenagers as Afghan 'enemy combatants' - report


    The U.S. has admitted detaining more than 200 Afghan teenagers - some as young as 13 - and keeping them locked up for about a year without charge.
    US held 200 teenagers as Afghan 'enemy combatants' - report - YouTube
    Tags: 200, afghan, combatants, enemy, held, report, teenagers
  • #2
    seems nobody cares about these 200 children.

    Comment

    • #3
      they did it to themselves
      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
        they did it to themselves
        why are you not saying that about the trajedy in Conn. Did they also do it to themsleves?

        Comment

        • #5
          Originally posted by khushal View Post
          why are you not saying that about the trajedy in Conn. Did they also do it to themsleves?


          Because those kids are innocent, these kids should know not affiliate with Taliban.
          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

          Comment

          • #6
            do you have proof that the children held by you yanks, were affiliated with the taliban?

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
              Because those kids are innocent, these kids should know not affiliate with Taliban.
              That's a fallacy RTR. I didn't expect such a statement from you.
              Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

              A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

              For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


              The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

              -Ferishta, 1560–1620

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                Because those kids are innocent, these kids should know not affiliate with Taliban.
                revealing your mental illness again.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by faye View Post
                  do you have proof that the children held by you yanks, were affiliated with the taliban?
                  The Taliban are known to target children for recruiting.
                  [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                  2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
                    That's a fallacy RTR. I didn't expect such a statement from you.
                    how is it a fallacy? elaborate....I'd never thought you'd claim things as fallacies without qualifying it first.
                    [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                    2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by khushal View Post
                      revealing your mental illness again.

                      is this one of Khushal's famous phony baloney unqualified psych evaluations again? ....
                      [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                      2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                        The Taliban are known to target children for recruiting.
                        in other words, as per usual, you have NO PROOF.
                        for someone who pertains to be logical and wants proof for eveything, you are constantly putting forward faulty accusations.
                        lift your game.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
                          how is it a fallacy? elaborate....I'd never thought you'd claim things as fallacies without qualifying it first.

                          I think Admin means that if you watch the clip the lady says that some of these kids were anything from bystanders at whatwas occurring to family members to two or three kids sitting at home in the hut and were abducted. That is, a number of them were not directly involved but happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time or just at a home that was located near a skirmish.
                          "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
                            That's a fallacy RTR. I didn't expect such a statement from you.
                            it is worth banning.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Originally posted by faye View Post
                              in other words, as per usual, you have NO PROOF.
                              for someone who pertains to be logical and wants proof for eveything, you are constantly putting forward faulty accusations.
                              lift your game.

                              No I always have proof ....so you're lying right there.

                              I've caught you lying several times
                              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 9 template Next
                              Working...
                              X