Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Beware of this picture

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by R3SISTANC3 View Post
    Last I check'd Pan-Islamists are hiding from the imperial drones, so I don't know which world you live in. "Progressive movements" is basically saying conforming to the perspectives of the Anglo/Saxons, their ethos, values and morals and taking them on as the personification of good (white) and bad (the rest of us).

    You are a mentally defeated conformist who has been manipulated into self hate, your past, history, and cultural values. You don't see that because you don't have a backbone to question it. To stand up to what appeals to power. So you justify your cowardice by projecting what you deem is wrong with your own society by scapegoating Punjabis, Arabs, Islamist and Islam/Muslims/Allah. The main reason behind that is because you dont wish to take personal responsibility. Blaming someone else for your problems makes it easy to live without it.
    I don't have any solution for the inferiority complexes and identity crisis of a rabies-bitten West-resident/parasite pan-Islamist. Why are you externalizing the flaws in Islam's legal system by ascribing them to the cultural characteristics of the local societies?

    The difference is West has learnt from its mistakes and is treating you with equality although not perfect---

    All the liberation movements in British colonies have been lead by progressive forces. The rabies-bitten religious zombies have only cared for their parochial interests and mostly were on the payroll of the British.

    Do something about your identity crisis instead of spewing the utter non-sense.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Toramana View Post
      I don't have any solution for the inferiority complexes and identity crisis of a rabies-bitten West-resident/parasite pan-Islamist. Why are you externalizing the flaws in Islam's legal system by ascribing them to the cultural characteristics of the local societies?

      The difference is West has learnt from its mistakes and is treating you with equality although not perfect---

      All the liberation movements in British colonies have been lead by progressive forces. The rabies-bitten religious zombies have only cared for their parochial interests and mostly were on the payroll of the British.

      Do something about your identity crisis instead of spewing the utter non-sense.


      You are the last person I would seek for solutions. You don't have solutions for anything, not even us Pashtuns. For your greatest contribution to us is a picture of a goat reminiscing on the nostalgic "what if" brain farts. Thank you but you give your self too much credit.

      I don't suffer from an identity crisis, as I am proud of who I am and where I come from. I always have, and will be. I am true to the values of my society instead of cowering like an intellectual dastard licking the boats of the imperialist "MASSA" drooling over a shiny coin . You are nothing but a house negro, delusional with the false promises that your handlers have reserved not only for you but every confirming and mentally defeated dog. In the end, when the dust clears, we can see that there are CONTINENTS devoid of their original inhabitants.

      Equality? Go ask Barak Hussien Obama, or the Jews who control Hollywood and Wall Street yet are afraid of disclosing their true names and identities because they fear repercussions. This is why they have been behind every Civil Rights group to keep the status quo. I can not expect a freshie intellectual non-entity like you to know the intricacies of Western history and the reality behind all those "progressive" changes....that even the writers and signers of Western constitutions owned SLAVES and birthed children from them in bondage.

      Only people like you, Utopian fools, fail to realize what the world really is. OR, you have already admitted defeat and get off by servitude.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Toramana View Post
        What about Arabs the overlords of many Pan-Islamists? And when he says that he doesn't mean favouring British? Why do you twist it into that. Pan-Islamist and religious bigots have mostly been allies of imperial forces against progressive movements.
        you have to admit, Talking about British imperialist schemes and then openly endorsing British hegemonic order is quite a contradiction.
        [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

        2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Toramana View Post
          [SIZE="3"]

          All the liberation movements in British colonies have been lead by progressive forces. The rabies-bitten religious zombies have only cared for their parochial interests and mostly were on the payroll of the British.

          ]
          very true but you also present a false dichotomy that Pan Islamist means Anti-Progressive. Sayyid Jamaluddin Al Afghani was a progressive Pan Islamist and so are the Ikhwan Al Muslimeen. all have a COUNTER Imperialist movement. I would actually argue Anti Imperialist movements were predominantly Pan-Islamist since secular Nationalists wanted to retain the British created borders
          [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

          2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

          Comment


          • #20
            resistance, it must make you feel like a loser for being part of the white christian created society, with your rabid racism against whites and your rabid hatred of christians. and muslim supremacism.
            it is obvious how painful it is for you and how bitter you are from this dire situation.
            but don't blame people on here for your unhappy state of mind.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by faye View Post
              resistance, it must make you feel like a loser for being part of the white christian created society, with your rabid racism against whites and your rabid hatred of christians. and muslim supremacism.
              it is obvious how painful it is for you and how bitter you are from this dire situation.
              but don't blame people on here for your unhappy state of mind.
              You sound like an incoherent retard. No I don't hate White people, just certain creatures that associate with that terminology. You will never understand how minorities of color and different faiths living among Western, predominantly White societies feel day in and out. The constant looks, mistrust, and reminders of our difference from birth to adulthood combined with the repetition of historical discrimination can not be brushed aside as benign social by-product. Especially if you take ALL OF THE HISTORICAL evidence to account of the pathological compulsive disdain of "Whites" towards non-Whites whether they are black, brown, yellow, Muslim, Jew, Hindu, Pagan, Heathen or Christian.

              Only an intellectually dishonest conformist will ignore it. It will be a very unwise thing to do. One must keep things in perspective to understand the reality of this world. Who are at the top of the food chain, and who at the bottom. Who suffers to provide and sustain certain live styles and "freedoms" and at whom or what expense.

              You are from Australia, F**KING AUSTRALIA!!!! LOLLL You out of all the people should succumb to guilt and choke on your own vomit...you shameless creature.

              Comment


              • #22
                resistance, guilt is for those who commit the crimes. are you feeling guilty for your brown or pinky ars sitting in america?

                as a typical, hypocritical american, coloniser of america and as a muslim, knowing that your arab muslim brothers, sold the africans as slaves to america, are you wallowing in guilt?


                lol. resistance to what? reality and acknowledgement of your own bulls dung.
                go suck on your own vomit

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by faye View Post
                  resistance, guilt is for those who commit the crimes. are you feeling guilty for your brown or pinky ars sitting in america?

                  as a typical, hypocritical american, coloniser of america and as a muslim, knowing that your arab muslim brothers, sold the africans as slaves to america, are you wallowing in guilt?

                  lol. resistance to what? reality and acknowledgement of your own bulls dung.
                  go suck on your own vomit
                  You know faye, some people are grateful and take tremendous pride in abandoning their beliefs, norms, values and identities. Like some defeatists who adopt English names like Tony and Tom etc. in order to fit in and appease the "MASSA".

                  But in our home village, it was a custom to name our dogs Tony, Tom, Peter or Bobby. This mentality is not limited to only our village, but most all Pashtun localities had this custom. Thus why your ilk, and your conforming dogs are having a hard time getting a hold on things in Afghanistan. Because unlike some dawoos, self-hating, treasonous traitors that we see here, the average Afghan/Pashtun is as proud of their roots as any Anglo pig roaming their streets with a rifle pointed towards their young and old.

                  The Green on Blue attacks is not some great MUZZLAMIC conspiracy. If anyone remembers correctly, the proud Vietnamese people did the exact same thing to their disrespectful and arrogant Whitey occupying "trainers" before they packed up and ranaway with their conforming pet dogs like Toramana & Soldat clinging on to the helicopter skids.
                  Last edited by R3SISTANC3; 09-03-2012, 01:16 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    muslims even helped develop australia with their camels. make you choke on your vomit, resistance?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by faye View Post
                      muslims even helped develop australia with their camels. make you choke on your vomit, resistance?
                      They were workers not occupiers that were brought over by the nation pillaging albinoid pigs. Have fun choking on that for a bit.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        i don't choke on facts of history dear.
                        the muslims helped the piggy wigs colonise the land of australia and america.

                        so what do you reckon about 1000 years of slave trade by your beloved arab brothers? do you think that the africans and all the other people they enslaved and sold were stolen from their land or did they all just volunteer?
                        they would have lost their land, their heritage, their families, been raped, abused, slaughtered, hung from trees, died on the trip to far off lands.
                        imagine, a roaring trade for a 1000 years. many millions i read.
                        oh, and the piles of slaughtered hindus and their demolished temples.

                        get the drift, resistance?
                        the brownies are just as big rsoles as the whities when they can be.
                        even recent history proves that. saddam, remember,,assad. are you keeping an eye?

                        get a reality check before throwing your pathetic blame games at me, you silly little man.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          First of all, taking actions by arabs and attrocoties caused in medievil history and then measuring them with terrorism by the west in last century is not very fair to use as a justification to proclaim "yeah were equal now", Muslims are not perfect, neither are Pashtuns but the difference is that Muslims havent labeled themselves the 'world police' and supreme judge of all matters or the right to stick their fingers into anycountry they want.
                          ----------

                          *You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*

                          Originally posted by Karachi
                          like I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            arab slave trade 650-1900.
                            so, about 100 years after australia was colonised, the trans sahara slave trade was abolished under sultan hamoud bin mohammad. that is hardly medieval, manzareh.
                            so islamic imperialism, and their rape and pillage, must be kept in the closet, so you can keep pretending that only the whities are the evil ones.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Manzareh View Post
                              First of all, taking actions by arabs and attrocoties caused in medievil history and then measuring them with terrorism by the west in last century is not very fair to use as a justification to proclaim "yeah were equal now", Muslims are not perfect, neither are Pashtuns but the difference is that Muslims havent labeled themselves the 'world police' and supreme judge of all matters or the right to stick their fingers into anycountry they want.
                              Not true, Muslims have an entitlement psychology, we believe that we are privileged and because of that privilege we have the right to conquest others.

                              Look at some of "Afghanistan2010's post where he gloats about traveling to India and massacreing Indians, his attitude is more or less like the West's
                              [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

                              2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by faye View Post
                                i don't choke on facts of history dear.
                                the muslims helped the piggy wigs colonise the land of australia and america.

                                so what do you reckon about 1000 years of slave trade by your beloved arab brothers? do you think that the africans and all the other people they enslaved and sold were stolen from their land or did they all just volunteer?
                                they would have lost their land, their heritage, their families, been raped, abused, slaughtered, hung from trees, died on the trip to far off lands.
                                imagine, a roaring trade for a 1000 years. many millions i read.
                                oh, and the piles of slaughtered hindus and their demolished temples.

                                get the drift, resistance?
                                the brownies are just as big rsoles as the whities when they can be.
                                even recent history proves that. saddam, remember,,assad. are you keeping an eye?

                                get a reality check before throwing your pathetic blame games at me, you silly little man.

                                You don't know what you are talking about. You don't know a thing about the Arab slave trade. The Arabs didn't just enslaved Africans but also other Arabs, and most other communities that they came in contact with. The Arab slave trade was essentially commercial and not based on racial superiority perpetuated by a religious doctrine that equated Whites to be created in the image of God himself.

                                Saddam and Assad are peanuts to the carnage of the Anglo/Saxons spanning over 600 years continuing till this day.

                                Your retarded argument about the treatment of Hindus again can be addressed by the fact that over 1000 years of Muslim rule India today is still majority Hindu. Unlike the Americas, where in just 400 years almost all indigenous people, languages, cultures and beliefs are EXTINCTED. Arabs make only 13% of the 1.2 Billion Muslims while majority of the Christians are White and of European decent (including the produce of systematic genocidal rape). Christianity (enlightenment/illumination), and other fancy terms like "progressiveness", "modernity", "freedom", "democracy" are all extensions of European heritage that promotes European perspectives, languages, norms and values at the expense of the locals. This is why the 3 main languages in Americas are Spanish, Portuguese, and English. WTF are these European languages doing on the RED LAND? How about Australia or South Africa?

                                Interesting that your ilk had India in sight as well, though the Muslims were there prior to them otherwise all those boot licking "porch monkeys" as the British called them would have met the same fate as the Native Americans did. Why do you think they are called "Indians"?
                                Last edited by R3SISTANC3; 09-03-2012, 08:35 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X