Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist (Documentary) - 1

[Manzareh]

This is the Prologue to the new documentary from The Corbett Report, Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist. This documentary interrogates the notion that Osama Bin Laden single-handedly runs the pervasive Al Qaeda terrorist network by examining its inception, its links to Western intelligence, the double agents and fictitious characters that populate its ranks, and the fraudulent ways the Al Qaeda myth is propagated in the controlled corporate media. The documentary also offers ways that citizens can become involved in helping to spread understanding about the true government-sponsored terror paradigm.

For more information about the documentary, please visit:

http://www.alqaedadoesntexist.com

For more news and analysis from The Corbett Report, please visit:

http://www.corbettreport.com

YouTube - Al Qaeda Doesn't Exist (Documentary) - 1

[کیش]

I heard of this documentary. I believe BBC did something seriously.

al- Qaeda exist only in Mass media.

[khushal]

I heard of this documentary. I believe BBC did something seriously.

al- Qaeda exist only in Mass media.

Al Quada exists as a very weak organization that the CIA had created and is still covertly funding its survival, but it is not this threat the media makes them out to be. Putting a bomb in an underwear is not going to destroy western civilization, but the media plays it out as though if the bomb in the underwear had exploded, we would have almost been wiped out, Woof (wipes sweat off of forehead) that was a close one.
The common cold is more dangerious and kills more americans than AL Quada has or ever could.

So the moral of the story is: Beware of the common cold. Al quada? as the itialians say "forgetaboutit"

[Catya Sher]

Idiot,

IS THIS the one to which you were referring?
I think the BBC one at this link here
makes the story interesting.

This Corbett one takes forever to make its point and wastes our time with
all these clips ....
which are precisely I always say to not waste a second watching
"experts" on TV

I don't believe a single one of them, even that Michael Scheurer [sp?] who seems to know more than others and be better than the average expert.

But no one who REALLY SPEAKS the truth is going to brought onto any mainstream media program.

It is rarely allowed because of the fact that all media upper echelons
are part of the same international conglomerate which has ITS OWN AGENDA to pound in.

Media is never an instrument to teach or educate, but only to INDOCTRINATE THE MASSES.

Just like the Soviet Union. No different, just more subtle.

It's not that easy to find this BBC one anymore.

Here's one link to it at appropriately named "Above Top Secret " - !

BBC now admits al qaeda never existed, page 1

Manzareh, thanks for posting it so we can keep an eye out
Maybe the documentary itself will be better than this slow, uninteresting promo.

[Catya Sher]

khushal,
I can just hear that Sicilian accent: "FORGET about it" - !

Even on this Corbett clip, one can see that one of the pics of a
supposed Osama speaking is a total imposter, likely a Mossad creature
posing to deliver some ominous sounding threat to justify trillions going into
Israeli pockets.
They tell America: "Listen don't do this difficult work.
Leave it to us. We'll handle these Muslims.
We know about them better than you.

Just give us a huge budget and we'll take care of all."

Seriously, it does work like this.
All the money goes into Israeli pockets and presto, al-Qaeda is made to look
threatening. A few supposed arrests are made, a few supposed confessions occur,
and no one in the US ever asks Mossad to return the change, please.

Tel Aviv banks on this lax attitude.

[کیش]

Michael Schauer was the CIA officer in Afghanistan/Pakistan from 1980"s to 2000. He knows his stuff. Am currenlt reading "Ghost Wars" i think you will like it.

[abubaker]

what's al quada

[کیش]

what's al quada

I think it's Arabic for" the pentagon"

[Catya Sher]

^ We have the smartest idiot around!

About Michael Scheurer, of course he knows a fair amount.
Most of these "experts" are REAL idiots:
anyone can see that.

Scheurer or however his name is spelled is competent, yes.

But WHY is he a STANDARD on these programs?

I don't trust that he speaks complete truth.

My suspicion is: he gives PART of it, but agrees to go with the networks' agenda overall of not telling the public everything
the public REALLY NEEDS to hear.

Why isn't he explaining about Mossad's role in that particular day in Sept, for one glaring example?

It was the first thing that I thought of on that day when someone told me the news.

It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.

A CIA agent would certainly know every detail of how tightly interlocked are the 2 agencies.
Where are some expositions about that and the INCALCULABLE harm Israel has done to America since their bombing of the USS Liberty in 1967 ?

These are elementary to understanding US foreign policy.

Who tells us about them though?
Only alternative news stations.

See what I mean about these guys ?

Ghost Wars I haven't read yet because I have mixed feelings about its author.
Tell me what you think ==

[Admin Khan]

Whether Al Qaeda exists or not, isn't the problem.

The problem is that America has many, and I mean many enemies. Nearly every Joe in Pakistan and Afghanistan wishes ill on the USA. That alone is alarming. The USA, by wiping villages off the map has developed enemies. Those enemies would now love to see Americans suffer the same way the Arab world and Af-Pak is suffering.

[KhyberKhan]

A lot of people like to make money of dumb people. For example the Alex Jones fan club. It's better to watch actual videos/interviews with those under the umbrella of such organizations than to get info from people with little understanding but lots of experience using Final Cut Pro.

A good start would be the Tayseer Allouni interview. And if you're reading this and thinking "who?" right now... You're probably one of the ones that needs to wisen up.

Google is your friend.

[Catya Sher]

But Admin Khan,

My instinct is that those whose villages were struck or suffered in any way
are furious.
Some do sign up for various resistance groups.

But they don't harbor that same level of hate that virtually all Americans
have been CONDITIONED by the media and govt officials to ASSUME that they do.

Look at a recent period of 24 hours. There were an amazing number of policemen killed here in the US.

Who did it?

All hostile or drugged or demonized Americans

Not one Afghan came over and shot a policeman.
OR ANYONE ELSE IN AMERICA !

There is no threat of retaliation HERE on American soil

This is the angel that Americans could not grasp because they don't know Afghans.

Arabs are more fiery perhaps. But even they target their own govts.
The Egyptian Jihad group which killed Sadat in Oct 1981 did not
design plots against America, perceived at that time as Sadat's sponsor.

They took direct action on what they perceived as the source of their
persecution by the Egyptian govt.

Same thing in Afghanistan. Angry Pashtuns and Afghans will attack the NATO forces
on THEIR own soil
They won't launch plots to shoot Congresswomen, or something like that.
That type of attack is done by a sick but IMMATURE attention-getter.

I see Afghans as more patient, more sensible and more mature.
They would see the difference between such propaganda-value assaults
which would accomplish NOTHING for them whatsoever - and
a demonstration or verbal complaint or physical attack on a convoy which
is in their own neighborhood as a way to express anger.

I can't say for sure because I haven't interviewed any Taliban commanders recently [!] - but I doubt HIGHLY that they spent hours planning how to
launch some raid on an American city to get Americans back.

They are much brighter than this.

[Admin Khan]

But Admin Khan,

My instinct is that those whose villages were struck or suffered in any way
are furious.
Some do sign up for various resistance groups.

Yup, that's pretty much what I said. There are many, and I mean resistance groups that are simply Anti-American and they will do anything to make Americans witness the same pain they have witnessed. Al Qaeda doesn't have a monopoly on the "We hate America, you Americans will suffer" phrase.

America needs to realize the more villages they wipe, the more casualties and potential terror threats they will witness. Revenge is embedded in the Pashtun culture, you cant wipe off a Pashtun village and expect to get away with it.

[Catya Sher]

Further, though there is the "vengeance" part of Pashtunwali or whatever it was decided to call the code of Pashtuns -

there is an innate sense of realism in that I don't see Afghans as thinking in such terms as to make Americans suffer for having made THEM suffer.

I see it as they just want America out of their lands and out of their business so they can back to work and feed their families, raise crops, etc.

I really think that the percentage of those who would even THINK OF
a revenge attack here is absolutely negligible.

But Americans have no clue of this because they are not allowed to
see for example Pashtuns interviewed on nightly TV.

Only American "experts" are called in.
Perhaps Hussain Haqqani, the Pakistani Ambassador who is approved by the highest circles in Washington to give what they consider appropriate commentary.

This is a big gap in comprehension which to my knowledge no has addressed til this minute.

[khushal]

Whether Al Qaeda exists or not, isn't the problem.

The problem is that America has many, and I mean many enemies. Nearly every Joe in Pakistan and Afghanistan wishes ill on the USA. That alone is alarming. The USA, by wiping villages off the map has developed enemies. Those enemies would now love to see Americans suffer the same way the Arab world and Af-Pak is suffering.

Wiping out villages will create hatred for amierica but it will not threaten america. Americas biggest threat is its own people. The American elites have to control public opinion. If they create a bogey man out there and convince the american people that this bogey man will destroy america and its freedoms unless policy A or policy B is not followed.
The american people will not allow their sons to go out there and risk their lives or allow their government to spend trillions of their tax dollars to bomb innocent people unless they feel they are threatened so you have to create this bogey man illusion.
Katrina destroyed one of americas great cities and it hardly made a dent in the american economy.