Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Islamic Dress

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by ذو الفقار View Post
    If I'm mentally ill then you are an atheist who considers any disclosing of a divine inspiration as either an intentional lie or mental illness.
    Nope, you’re just mentally ill. Alhamdulillah I’m no atheist, though your filthy false prophet Ghulam Ahmad probably was. Hard to believe a kafir like him could purposely mislead thousands for some cash without convincing himself that there is no god.

    Or perhaps his god was the queen of England? You can commune with him right? So next time you’re talking to him ask him that question for me.

    Originally posted by ذو الفقار View Post
    How am I an atheist?

    Atheists necessarily deny all divine inspirations and revelations without discrimination. They immediately dismiss any claimant of divine inspiration as either a liar or delusional.

    Since maneatinglizard has done exactly that, I have compared him to atheist.
    Lol you sure are working hard to prove your mental illness to us. The only “divine inspirations” I’ve rejected are those of Ghulam Ahmad, a dog of the British and kafir extraordinaire, and you, a nobody on the internet with some obvious mental and/or social problems.

    You guys have literally less credibility than Joseph Smith. So excuse me for seeing your “revelations” for what they are: the delusions of a handicapped person who should be kept off the internet.

    Originally posted by ذو الفقار View Post
    He shares with the atheists the idea that anyone who claims to have a divine inspiration or vision is "mentally ill".

    On my blog, I have written a brilliant 4-part series on the reality of divine inspiration in Islam, especially to non-Prophets, with dozens of references from the sacred Texts:

    رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ أَعِذْنِي مِنْ حَرِّ النَّارِ وَعَذَابِ الْقَبْرِ: Continuation of Divine Inspiration (Part 1)

    Whether the lizard-eater is an atheist or not, he certainly is ignorant of basic Islam.
    Your “brilliant” posts are nothing but rantings and copy-paste jobs. You’re so lazy you can’t even bother to remove the “alayhi salam” honorific from the names of Ali (رضي الله عنه) and his progeny when you copy-paste Shia works.

    I’m no scholar, nor do I claim to be, but you’ve somehow managed to adopt just about every deviant position you could find. I’m actually impressed by how deviant you are. And yet you still act like you deserve some sort of respect for wasting your time writing long posts no one reads on your personal blog, when you don’t even know the basics.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by maneatinglizard View Post
      Nope, you’re just mentally ill. Alhamdulillah I’m no atheist, though your filthy false prophet Ghulam Ahmad probably was. Hard to believe a kafir like him could purposely mislead thousands for some cash without convincing himself that there is no god.

      Or perhaps his god was the queen of England? You can commune with him right? So next time you’re talking to him ask him that question for me.



      Lol you sure are working hard to prove your mental illness to us. The only “divine inspirations” I’ve rejected are those of Ghulam Ahmad, a dog of the British and kafir extraordinaire, and you, a nobody on the internet with some obvious mental and/or social problems.

      You guys have literally less credibility than Joseph Smith. So excuse me for seeing your “revelations” for what they are: the delusions of a handicapped person who should be kept off the internet.



      Your “brilliant” posts are nothing but rantings and copy-paste jobs. You’re so lazy you can’t even bother to remove the “alayhi salam” honorific from the names of Ali (رضي الله عنه) and his progeny when you copy-paste Shia works.

      I’m no scholar, nor do I claim to be, but you’ve somehow managed to adopt just about every deviant position you could find. I’m actually impressed by how deviant you are. And yet you still act like you deserve some sort of respect for wasting your time writing long posts no one reads on your personal blog, when you don’t even know the basics.
      The Holy Qur'aan mentions the fact that the disbelievers considered the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم as "Majnoon" no less than 8 times.

      Similarly, the Quraan states that Prophets Noah and Moses were likewise accused of being "Majnoon"

      Allah says:

      Similarly, there came not to those before them any messenger except that they said, "A magician or a madman." (Sura 51:52)

      If anyone claims to be a Prophet or otherwise a recipient of divine inspiration, for him NOT to be called "mentally ill" would be bizarre even impossible.

      As for writing عليه السلام next to the name of Sayyidina Ali عليه السلام and other members of Ahlul Bait and the Panjtan Paak, this is not exclusive to the Shi'a if you had even a measure of religious knowledge.

      The invocation of عليه السلام next to Amir-ul-Mu'mineen Ali عليه السلام has been used multiple times in Sahih al-Bukhari itself. For example:





      However, if you look at this exact same Hadith as it occurs in the Darus Salaam edition published from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, translated by Muhsin Khan, you will be shocked to see how those Nasibi Saudis, due to their bughz to Ahlul Bait and Amir-ul-Mu'mineen, replaced what Imam Bukhari himself wrote of عليه السلام with رضى الله عنه

      This is nothing short of Tehrif of Sahih al Bukhari. These liars have been caught red-handed, therefore, I don't blame you for thinking it strange that a non-Shia like me or Imam Bukhari would write عليه السلام next to sayyidina Ali because you have obviously been brainwashed by Saudi literature:



      [SIZE="4"][FONT="HardTimesW01-Roman"]My Blog
      [url]www.salvation-from-hell.com[/url][/FONT][/SIZE]

      Comment

      Working...
      X