Story of India

[Elite Pakhtun]

OK, you're obviously trolling to some laughs. Either that or you're really really stupid.

Even this map (different from the map in Wiki, but who cares... there's possibly more than 1 theory I don't know) shows them going from Somalia/Ethiopia to the Arab peninsula, to what I would guess is either present day Iran or Pak. After that it goes to 1 place in present day india (Gujarat) and then splits up to all over the place.

How the **** would they go from Africa to all of India directly? Those jumps from Ethiopia to Saudi and from gulf to Pak are small bodies of water i.e. fairly close distances. Not sure how they crossed... either boat or it was frozen water is my guess.

And to end this stupid "discussion", let's pretend somehow they did leapfrog directly into India from Somalia... so what? Do you see how Africans are treated and have been treated in the past? They're the original people too. Doesn't mean anything apparently.

[mungojerry]

OK, you're obviously trolling to some laughs. Either that or you're really really stupid.

Even this map (different from the map in Wiki, but who cares... there's possibly more than 1 theory I don't know) shows them going from Somalia/Ethiopia to the Arab peninsula, to what I would guess is either present day Iran or Pak. After that it goes to 1 place in present day india (Gujarat) and then splits up to all over the place.

How the **** would they go from Africa to all of India directly? Those jumps from Ethiopia to Saudi and from gulf to Pak are small bodies of water i.e. fairly close distances. Not sure how they crossed... either boat or it was frozen water is my guess.

And to end this stupid "discussion", let's pretend somehow they did leapfrog directly into India from Somalia... so what? Do you see how Africans are treated and have been treated in the past? They're the original people too. Doesn't mean anything apparently.

haha, Karachi showed you we are your baaps. try to understand.

[Manzareh]

Even if they had boats in Primitive times they wouldnt be able to cross sea with ease, the likely route is on foot, which means they covered many more countries. Even from that map though, Iran, Pakistan comes before India. Also when the people landed in Qatar, Afghanistan and India are the same distance away whos to say some didnt travel north?

[Manzareh]

haha, Karachi showed you we are your baaps. try to understand.

Your baap is the Pashtun guy in your display picture.

[Karachi]

Even if they had boats in Primitive times they wouldnt be able to cross sea with ease, the likely route is on foot, which means they covered many more countries. Even from that map though, Iran, Pakistan comes before India. Also when the people landed in Qatar, Afghanistan and India are the same distance away whos to say some didnt travel north?

Everyone agrees they took the coastal route to India, from Somalia, to the Arabian peninsula and to present day Balochistan, to India


The thing is most of you are not familiar with genetics and genes, only Indians, Andamanese and other people like Papuans/Australoids show the very first out of Africa genes, this is why they are darkskinned

People like Arabs, Afghans, Iranians etc... are actually later migrants to their areas. I will talk about this later

[Manzareh]

Everyone agrees they took the coastal route to India, from Somalia, to the Arabian peninsula and to present day Balochistan, to India

SO quit saying direct to India from africa because its not direct at all, i believe thats what Elite Pashtun is trying to tell you.

[Karachi]

SO quit saying direct to India from africa because its not direct at all, i believe thats what Elite Pashtun is trying to tell you.

India is a direct link genetically, this is what I meant, I forgot you idiots are so dumb to understand that

[Elite Pakhtun]

India is a direct link genetically, this is what I meant, I forgot you idiots are so dumb to understand that

Mother ****er, how does indiot-land have more of a direct link than the Arab peninsula or Balochistan/Iran?

"direct link"

[Karachi]

Mother ****er, how does indiot-land have more of a direct link than the Arab peninsula or Balochistan/Iran?

"direct link"

because the M 130 gene came from India and spread all over the world, M 130 gene is the direct link to Africa, Here:

Although Haplogroup C-M130 attains its highest frequencies among the indigenous populations of Mongolia, the Russian Far East, Polynesia, Australia, and at moderate frequency in Korea and Manchu people, it displays its highest diversity among modern populations of India. It is therefore hypothesized that Haplogroup C-M130 either originated or underwent its longest period of evolution within India or the greater South Asian coastal region. The highest diversity is observed in Southeast Asia, and its northward expansion in East Asia started approximately 40,000 years ago.[2]
Males carrying C-M130 are believed to have migrated to the Americas some 6,000-8,000 years before present, and was carried by Na-Dené-speaking peoples into the northwest Pacific coast of North America.
Asia is also the area in which Haplogroup D-M174 is concentrated. However, D-M174 is more closely related to haplogroup E than to C-M130 and the geographical distributions of Haplogroups C-M130 and D-M174 are entirely and utterly different, with various subtypes of Haplogroup C-M130 being found at high frequency amongst indigenous Australians, Polynesians, Vietnamese, Kazakhs, Mongolians, Manchurians, Koreans, and indigenous inhabitants of the Russian Far East; and at moderate frequencies elsewhere throughout Asia and Oceania, including India and Southeast Asia. Whereas Haplogroup D is found at high frequencies only amongst Tibetans, Japanese peoples, and Andaman Islanders, and has been found neither in India nor among the aboriginal inhabitants of the Americas or Oceania.

[Karachi]

People living in Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan etc... do not carry this gene, which remains you guys not related directly to the first migrants out of Africa like the Indians are, you guys evolved later from Indians


There was a study that Kashmir/North India, may have populated Central Asia/Europe Kashmiris populated Europe 4, years back: Study

which again means, people migrated from India towards central asia/europe at some point. Like it or not, Indians are the oldest non african groups, our genes are very old

[Aryana]

People living in Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan etc... do not carry this gene, which remains you guys not related directly to the first migrants out of Africa like the Indians are, you guys evolved later from Indians


There was a study that Kashmir/North India, may have populated Central Asia/Europe Kashmiris populated Europe 4�,��� years back: Study

which again means, people migrated from India towards central asia/europe at some point. Like it or not, Indians are the oldest non african groups, our genes are very old

That's because Indians (and Porkistanis) are Australoid.

[Manzareh]

People living in Arabia, Iran, Afghanistan etc... do not carry this gene, which remains you guys not related directly to the first migrants out of Africa like the Indians are, you guys evolved later from Indians


There was a study that Kashmir/North India, may have populated Central Asia/Europe Kashmiris populated Europe 4�,��� years back: Study

which again means, people migrated from India towards central asia/europe at some point. Like it or not, Indians are the oldest non african groups, our genes are very old

Really though, what difference does this really make?? As in what advantage does this give you in the world?

[Elite Pakhtun]

Although Haplogroup C-M130 attains its highest frequencies among the indigenous populations of Mongolia, the Russian Far East, Polynesia, Australia, and at moderate frequency in Korea and Manchu people, it displays its highest diversity among modern populations of India. It is therefore hypothesized that Haplogroup C-M130 either originated or underwent its longest period of evolution within India or the greater South Asian coastal region.

Your own ****ing post:

A) they don't know if it originated or underwent evolution there. Do you know anything about Haplogroups? They evolve over time at various regions.
B) Since it's clearly not prevalent in Pak and Afg, you are therefore NOT our baap
C) Even if we pretend this is some ancient DNA that you have, it means **** all since Africans themselves have been traded like human commodities (that's right... they were traded like corn or wheat, only they happened to be slaves)
D) We are more likely your baap since empires went from the west into the east and probably raped and pillaged your ancestors (especially if you're sikh)

MOST IMPORTANTLY D) Your dumb migration hypothesis has been nullified since the map shows something else, and the post you put doesn't even confirm what you're saying.

Now do me a favor and shut up. You're persisting on an argument you're in way out of your depth in.

[Kabulistan]

Really though, what difference does this really make?? As in what advantage does this give you in the world?

He wants to be your baap...lool...

Indians are okay people, but I think most people dont like them as a race in the sense of race mix with them because they generally have unattractive features (have not met an Indian women yet where I thought, "okay she is kinda attractive". They all look like this: no racist or hater, just saying truth.



Its the Australoid mixture that makes Indians generally unattractive/undesirable as a race. Australoids have extremely primitive feauteres and primitive features = unattractive/undesirable.

avarage Pakistani Punjabi women: show next to nothing of Australoid mixture = attractive!

[mungojerry]

He wants to be your baap...lool...

Indians are okay people, but I think most people dont like them as a race in the sense of race mix with them because they generally have unattractive features (have not met an Indian women yet where I thought, "okay she is kinda attractive". They all look like this: no racist or hater, just saying truth.



Its the Australoid mixture that makes Indians generally unattractive/undesirable as a race. Australoids have extremely primitive feauteres and primitive features = unattractive/undesirable.

avarage Pakistani Punjabi women: show next to nothing of Australoid mixture = attractive!

you are crazy man. we pakistanis have average womans look like this not your silly photo. brothar stop being pashtunes doggy.