14 year old to star in nude scene :|

[laevanay]

baring children in wedlock is the same as staring in porn for you?

Just because one does it in front of a camera and others do it behind a door does not mean what they do is any different? Do you think its different?

[unknownprince]

Just because one does it in front of a camera and others do it behind a door does not mean what they do is any different? Do you think its different?

are you supporting child pornography?

[laevanay]

are you supporting child pornography?

Nope, never did never will and will never happen in an educated family like ours...now let me ask you a question, have you or your family ever married off a child less than 16 years of age? If so YOU support child sex/pronography whatever you want to call it. And please do not try to justify it, its all the same, just one does it in front of a camera and another behind closed doors.... by changing its name does not change he fact.

[IamDZJ]

Why does this shock you? Isn't that the age in which many Pakhtun get married? Not only do they get nude but they bear children at that age!!!!

does your bathroom have a door or walls by any chance? if yes then shut the **** up. if no then bravo, you are the only one of your kind.

[Alchemist]

Nope, never did never will and will never happen in an educated family like ours...now let me ask you a question, have you or your family ever married off a child less than 16 years of age? If so YOU support child sex/pronography whatever you want to call it. And please do not try to justify it, its all the same, just one does it in front of a camera and another behind closed doors.... by changing its name does not change he fact.

let me get this right.
You are saying:

Procreating with your spouse is the same as getting naked on camera and then have your nude image sold to millions of people for their pleasure as entertainment. You obviously don't understand the concept of "sharm" and "haya"...which means that you would probably film your self and your spouse and post it on the internet too.

I know what argument you are trying to make - that, yes in the secular western world there is a bit of hypocrisy with child pornography but in the religious east there is child marriage... but pornography and marriage are two different things.

There is something mentally off about you

[khushal]

Nope, never did never will and will never happen in an educated family like ours...now let me ask you a question, have you or your family ever married off a child less than 16 years of age? If so YOU support child sex/pronography whatever you want to call it. And please do not try to justify it, its all the same, just one does it in front of a camera and another behind closed doors.... by changing its name does not change he fact.

Educated family? you reek of stupidity. Where did you get this education you speak of?

[akbarkhan]

Nope, never did never will and will never happen in an educated family like ours...now let me ask you a question, have you or your family ever married off a child less than 16 years of age? If so YOU support child sex/pronography whatever you want to call it. And please do not try to justify it, its all the same, just one does it in front of a camera and another behind closed doors.... by changing its name does not change he fact.

lol @ educated family like yours.

If education was a metric of intelligence then the Indian brain surgeon wouldn't have worshipped a cow or drunk its urine.

Good luck with education.

[ScimitarXEdge]

Nope, never did never will and will never happen in an educated family like ours...now let me ask you a question, have you or your family ever married off a child less than 16 years of age? If so YOU support child sex/pronography whatever you want to call it. And please do not try to justify it, its all the same, just one does it in front of a camera and another behind closed doors.... by changing its name does not change he fact.

Your statements are bizarre and paradoxical; because child pornography consumption has never shown to be concentrated to a particular educational demographic

which makes me question your educational background since you make such presumed ideas, which indicates a lack of educated information.

now furthermore, your associations are incongruent; 16 is deemed as a legal minor ONLY in certain societies, there is no universal consensus on this; this is not the same nor laterally equivalent to "child"; and this notion is based on cultural mores and habits, not evidence based assumptions.

Anthropologically, childhood ends at puberty; because evolutionary mechanisms and adolescent development indicates the stage of acquiring functional adult attributes to sustain the social organization of the species.

this is not equal to sexual exploitation (pornography) which has shown no evidence of any Evolutionary Function in human beings.

For such an educated person, you make some very ill informed statements.

[laevanay]

I saw a lot of mumbo jumbo but the question does not get answered..... 16 or 14 whatever age, children are children.... certain cultures dont see anything wrong with pornography... are you trying to justify child marriages? Its very common and widely accepted in our society, so I don't blame you....

[laevanay]

lol @ educated family like yours.

If education was a metric of intelligence then the Indian brain surgeon wouldn't have worshipped a cow or drunk its urine.

Good luck with education.

You mean "drink"?