-
-
Talk about a planted news story.
How conveniently the main guy answers
EXACTLY what the American/NATO/NWO types want promulgated.
Every other time, REAL Taliban don't speak like this
about attacking NEW YORK?
Yeah sure !
These guys are fakes for sure.
The room - I think, could be wrong ! - looks TOO nice, TOO prepared.
The lead guy doesn't look a usual Taliban I think from his eyes.
Am I right? He looks shifty too.
Hope no one saw this DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN! -
lets not forget the tv set,as if they have time to watch oprah.Originally posted by Catya Sher View PostComment
-
^ good eye!
If you find this, for these get buried under new entries,
what do you think about the main so-called "taliban commander" -
his eyes don't look usual Taliban, who are confident and clear-eyed.
He speaks in a strange voice too, it just seemed to me.
I still can't get over the fastidiously arranged look of the room and the lush carpets.
Of course!
If we point this out, next time they'll take care to find shabbier carpets and a more authentic room.
That's why I'm writing in "camouflage grey" ink, so the wrong parties won't catch it and will keep making the same dumb mistakes in their propaganda clips.
The journalist seems weird too.
WHY ON EARTH would he sit so close to them?
It's not a pow-wow.
If he's really so experienced with Afghans and Muslims,
he wouldn't plant himself so uncomfortably close to them.
It marks him as too aggressive type overall, and even speaking Arabic supposedly, not really very sensitive to local preferences for personal space.
Is this a correct analysis ?
Comment
-
why would a Taliban commander risk coming all the way from wardak to meet a news reporter in a kabul apartmentOriginally posted by graveyardofempires View Post
besides the room is too clean lol
learned Arabic in a madrasa loooooooooool, hagha bechara pakhto sahi na si waila
why is there not a single reference to quran or ahadith by the ''taliban''Last edited by abubaker; 12-29-2010, 04:09 PM.Comment
-
looool kam bud da baghalish beshina...the taliban find it offensive to be so near an infidel.
i like the taliban's choice for drapes....with all due respect, taliban don't even sit like that!
I am no bird, and no nest ensnares me.
non commercial would cost less if he was in charge himself which he plans on doing. right now it's n herat but soon it will be in qanadahar.
Comment
-
Fake Taliban leader 'dupes Nato negotiators'
Impostor claiming to be Taliban chief Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour has tricked Afghan and Nato officials
Share
286
Jon Boone in Kabul
guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 23 November 2010 10.44 GMT
Article history
Afghan president Hamid Karzai dismissed the story as 'propaganda'. Photograph: Musadeq Sadeq/AP
The Afghan government and its Nato allies were duped into holding peace talks with a man posing as one of the most senior members of the Taliban leadership, it was revealed today.
According to Afghan and US sources quoted by the New York Times, authorities held face-to-face talks with the man who claimed to be Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour, the second highest official in the Taliban movement.
Western sources quoted by the New York Times also confirmed a Guardian report that the man was paid a large sum of money in the hope that he would remain engaged in negotiations.
But foreign and Afghan sources believe the man was lying about his identity after an Afghan official involved in one of the clandestine talks – who had previously met the Taliban chief – said he did not recognise the man posing as Mansour.
The revelation is a potential humiliation for Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president who has increasingly put his hopes in a peace deal with insurgents.
A western official in Kabul confirmed the thrust of the New York Times story and said the Americans had been aware of the blunder for some time, but refused to go into details. The US embassy referred all enquiries to the Afghan government.
No officials from Karzai's office were immediately available, but one Afghan with knowledge of the negotiations also confirmed the story.
In a press conference in Kabul called to mark Karzai's return from the Nato conference in Portugal, the Afghan president denied some of the key claims of report, including that he had ever met the man in his palace.
He also denied the senior Taliban leader travelled from Pakistan to Kabul. Officials say that on occasions Nato airplanes were used to transport the Taliban representatives. General David Petraeus, the US commander of Nato forces, confirmed that foreign forces have given safe passage to Taliban envoys involved in peace talks.
Karzai dismissed the recent press reports as "propaganda".
"Do not accept foreign media reports about meetings with Taliban leaders. Most of these reports are propaganda and lies," he said.
There has long been scepticism among foreign diplomats in Kabul about the seriousness of the talks, with most assuming the two sides were a long way from any sort of breakthrough. Concerns had also been raised about the payment of money to Taliban representatives, which suggested Karzai was more interested in buying off the insurgents rather than trying to engage with them.
But no one predicted the main interlocutor would be an impostor and possibly even, as the Washington Post reported, a humble shopkeeper from the Pakistani city of Quetta.
Close colleagues of Karzai said the Afghan president increasingly sees peace talks as the only way to end the conflict, while the president's critics accuse him of being too keen to compromise with the Pakistani intelligence agency which is believed to play a critical role in supporting insurgents.
The Taliban maintain their firm public line that they are not taking part in talks and will not consider negotiations until foreign troops leave Afghanistan. In a recent statement, the Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar said reports of peace talks were "misleading rumours".Comment
-
Just saw the later responses.
What was that about the Arabic studies in medresseh that seemed wrong?
Yes, I doubt Taliban use safe houses in Kabul = if they do, they sure do NOT look like 4 Star luxury!
What is it about the guy's eyes and voice that still bother me?
Any other things to pick out to illustrate that this was a set up for TV?
Perhaps the video edited out any Quranic references - to try to be fair and give the benefit of the doubt
Not that there's much doubt HERE !
Comment
Tweet
Comment