World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   "Pull out your swords and slay anyone that says Pashtun and Afghan are not one! Arabs know this and so do Romans: Afghans are Pashtuns, Pashtuns are Afghans!" -Khushal Khattak > >
Reload this Page Apple awarded $1bn in damages from Samsung in US court
User Tag List

Thread Tools Display Modes
din din is offline
PF senior
din is on a distinguished road
Posts: 6,613
Thanks: 1,135
Thanked 944 Times in 705 Posts
My Mood: Aggressive
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Default Apple awarded $1bn in damages from Samsung in US court - 08-25-2012, 05:39 AM

25 August 2012 Last updated at 07:39 GMT Share

Apple awarded $1bn in damages from Samsung in US court

Apple and Samsung make the bestselling smartphones in the market
Continue reading the main story Related Stories

A US court has ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05bn (665m) in damages for infringing intellectual property.
The jury decided several Samsung devices had infringed iPhone-maker Apple's software and design patents, but rejected counter-claims by Samsung.
Apple will now seek import bans on several of its rival's products. Samsung has said it will appeal.
Correspondents say the ruling is one of the most significant in a global battle over patents and intellectual property.
In recent weeks, a court in South Korea ruled that both technology firms had copied each other, while a British court threw out claims by the US company that Samsung had infringed its copyright.
But the year-long US case has involved some of the biggest damages claims, and is likely to shape the way patent licences are handled in the future.
'Monopoly' gibe Samsung promised to appeal against the decision describing it as "a loss for the American consumer".
The Mesmerize, Galaxy Prevail and Infuse were among the handsets found to have infringed Apple's patents
"It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices," the South Korean firm said.
The statement added that it was "unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners".
Apple, however, said it applauded the court "for finding Samsung's behaviour wilful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn't right".
Apple said it intended to seek sales injunctions at a follow-up hearing on 20 September
The two firms account for more than half of global smartphone and tablet computer sales.
The nine-person jury at the federal court in San Jose, California had to consider 700 questions about each side's claim that its rival had infringed its intellectual property.
It deliberated for less than three days before coming to a unanimous decision, rejecting all of Samsung's claims and upholding five of Apple's allegations, including:
  • Some of Samsung's handsets, including its Galaxy S 4G model, infringed Apple's design patents for the look of its iPhone including the system it uses to display text and icons
  • All the disputed Samsung devices had copied Apple's "bounce-back response", which makes lists jump back as if yanked by a rubber band
  • Several Samsung devices incorporated Apple's facility allowing users to zoom into text with a tap of a finger
Apple had wanted $2.5bn in damages. Samsung had sought $519m.
'Social cost' Michael Gartenburg, research director at Gartner, told the BBC it could be a good thing for consumers in the long run because it would force Apple's competitors to innovate.
Apple won most of its claims but did not convince the jury its iPad design patent had been infringed
"Anyone who was even thinking about borrowing a technology or design from Apple will think twice about it now," he said.
Other analysts point out that Apple could be the overall loser because the court case has helped boost Samsung's profile.
Also, the South Korean firm has already brought out a new generation of products that should avoid the patent issues.
However, Christopher Marlett of investment bank MDB Capital Group said there was a "social cost" for Samsung.
"As a company, you don't want to be known as someone who steals from someone else," he said.
Apple remains one of the South Korean company's biggest customers buying computer chips and, reportedly, screens.

Reply With Quote
Pisho Pisho is offline
PF contributor
Pisho is on a distinguished road
Posts: 1,681
Thanks: 710
Thanked 402 Times in 330 Posts
My Mood: Blah
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Default 08-26-2012, 02:48 PM

I'm soo over apple they are money hungry and I hate how they come up with new versions of the same thing grrr I think I'm switching to android soon i just hate using iTunes for everything...
Reply With Quote
Afghanistan2010's Avatar
Afghanistan2010 Afghanistan2010 is offline
PF senior
Afghanistan2010 is on a distinguished road
Posts: 4,921
Thanks: 2,561
Thanked 1,069 Times in 854 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Default 08-26-2012, 02:57 PM

I prefer samsung over apple....

High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.
Reply With Quote

$1bn, apple, awarded, court, damages, samsung

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

History of Pashtuns| Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki|| Pukhtoogle| Afghan MP3||| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.