Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto |
World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto | > Politics & Current Affairs > World News - د نړۍ خبرونه
Reload this Page India categorically rejects Iran oil sanctions
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1)
Old
Ghundal Ghundal is offline
PF contributor
Ghundal is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 94
Thanked 193 Times in 149 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Default India categorically rejects Iran oil sanctions - 02-01-2012, 02:17 AM

India categorically rejects Iran oil sanctions

By M K Bhadrakumar – January 30, 2012

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee has set at rest firmly and authoritatively all speculative reports that India might buckle under American pressure and fall in line passively with the spirit of the United States’ sanctions against Iran by quietly cutting back its oil imports from Iran. That FM made the categorical statement while on a visit to the US is of added significance.
Earlier, ambassador to the US Nirupama Rao created some confusion by claiming India was cutting down its oil purchases from Iran as a considered decision. Rao was speaking after American politicians and commentators began making threatening noises as part of a psywar. According to media reports, she vaguely hinted that India was acting in tandem with Washington.
Of course, Mukherjee’s statement has hit the headlines, as it follows similar indications from China. With China and India defying the US’ sanctions regime, Japan and South Korea and other south-east Asian countries would follow suit. Tehran Times has reported that Delhi is actively exploring various options to work out a payment mechanism for India’s oil imports from Iran and is “trying to buy as much Iranian oil as possible.” The Beijing daily Global Times featured an editorial today calling on China to coordinate with south and southeast Asian countries and “try its best to form a temporary alliance with them in continuing to buy oil from Iran. Such an alliance is possible, as seen from the hesitation of countries like Japan and India in sanctioning Iran.” The editorial anticipated that at some point Washington might even offer to Beijing some trade-off but China won’t cave in as Iran is far too important a relationship to compromise.
The GT editorial carries forward the train of thought that the paper fleshed out in an earlier article a fortnight ago when it inter alia called for coordinating with Russia - “the two should support each other in this [Iran] matter.”
India and China would also factor in that the European Union sanctions against Iran might not prove sustainable in any case. The panic in the European capitals was obvious when Iran threatened retaliation. Within hours, back channels were apparently activated to prevail upon Tehran not to go ahead with its own embargo on oil exports to Europe this week (six months before the EU sanctions will come into effect). It seems Tehran has obliged the European entreaties but its threat of retaliation hangs like the sword of Damocles on the European economies.
Clearly, the assumption that Iran will be brought to its knees through oil sanctions is flawed. Iran has successfully withstood 30 years of US sanctions. It is also wrong to caricature Iran as a chronic case of the so-called Dutch syndrome. Iran has a diverse economy, its human resources are very substantial and it can progress even with reduced oil income.
That is to say, all this drama is actually geopolitical. Evidently, Iran is keen not to exacerbate the tensions. The latest indications are that Tehran is constructively engaging the IAEA inspectors although holding fast to its principled position on the nuclear issue, namely, that it has every right to pursue a nuclear programme as stipulated under the NPT.
All things taken into account, therefore, Delhi has done exceedingly well by taking such a clear-cut stance on the entire question and its ramifications.










http://blogs.rediff.com/mkbhadrakuma...oil-sanctions/

Last edited by Ghundal; 02-01-2012 at 02:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ghundal For This Useful Post:
faye (02-01-2012)
(#2)
Old
Ghundal Ghundal is offline
PF contributor
Ghundal is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 94
Thanked 193 Times in 149 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Default 02-01-2012, 02:27 AM

Of course, Mukherjee’s statement has hit the headlines, as it follows similar indications from China. With China and India defying the US’ sanctions regime, Japan and South Korea and other south-east Asian countries would follow suit. Tehran Times has reported that Delhi is actively exploring various options to work out a payment mechanism for India’s oil imports from Iran and is “trying to buy as much Iranian oil as possible.” The Beijing daily Global Times featured an editorial today calling on China to coordinate with south and southeast Asian countries and “try its best to form a temporary alliance with them in continuing to buy oil from Iran. Such an alliance is possible, as seen from the hesitation of countries like Japan and India in sanctioning Iran.” The editorial anticipated that at some point Washington might even offer to Beijing some trade-off but China won’t cave in as Iran is far too important a relationship to compromise.
Reply With Quote
(#3)
Old
faye faye is offline
PF senior
faye is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 9,671
Thanks: 7,585
Thanked 1,782 Times in 1,462 Posts
My Mood: Breezy
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: australia
Default 02-01-2012, 05:40 PM

i wish australia would do that. about time countries stood up to the u.s. against their bullying tactics.
Reply With Quote
(#4)
Old
KhalsaWarrior's Avatar
KhalsaWarrior KhalsaWarrior is offline
PF knowledgeable
KhalsaWarrior is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 791
Thanks: 48
Thanked 392 Times in 264 Posts
My Mood: Lurking
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Delhi
Default 02-08-2012, 04:50 AM

What..India is not following its western masters? Gundal, this ain't right, surely?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KhalsaWarrior For This Useful Post:
JattApache (02-08-2012)
(#5)
Old
JattApache JattApache is offline
PF knowledgeable
JattApache is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Posts: 843
Thanks: 453
Thanked 101 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jan 2012
Default 02-08-2012, 05:13 AM

India has to be independant like China And Russia
Reply With Quote
(#6)
Old
faye faye is offline
PF senior
faye is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 9,671
Thanks: 7,585
Thanked 1,782 Times in 1,462 Posts
My Mood: Breezy
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: australia
Default 02-08-2012, 05:38 AM

now india, just has to get rid of those other ****bags, monsanto, syngenta and co.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
categorically, india, iran, oil, rejects, sanctions

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




History of Pashtuns| Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki| TheHujra.com| Pukhtoogle| Afghanvoice.com| Khyber.org| Pukhto.net| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.