Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto |
World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto | > Politics & Current Affairs > Political Talk - سياسي خبرې
Reload this Page Why someone is blackmailing Kayani
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1)
Old
unknownprince
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default Why someone is blackmailing Kayani - 12-08-2011, 01:59 PM

Why someone is blackmailing Kayani

By M K Bhadrakumar – December 8, 2011


Eli Lake’s column featured by Daily Beast is intriguing for more reasons than the obvious one that he is one of America’s ace reporters on the national security beat. Surely, someone in the know of things on the US’s intelligence operations in Pakistan gave him a peep into the secret world of the US’s intelligence network in Pakistan and that ’someone’ must be really ’someone’ very special of the stature of David Petraeus, for instance, for Lake to take him so seriously.
I wonder why that someone gave away so much that has a most acute angle to it (which is hard to see except if you look closely), namely, that someone is softly, gently rocking Pakistani army chief Ashfaq Kayani, suggesting it’s time to wake up from the reverie. The reason could be that the Pakistani decision to expel the US from Shamsi airbase and to root out the remaining tentacles of the US’s parallel intelligence network is hurting.
After all, Iran just showed how to shoot down America’s latest stealth drone aircraft. And Kayani just told his men in the border with Afghanistan that they could shoot at what they want. With Shamsi gone out of US hands, America’s celebrated drone warfare may be ending in our part of the world till a more sophisticated model if perfected through the trial runs in the Somalian wilds.
Lake gives a fascinating insight into how the Americans prised open Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence [ISI] and played havoc with it ultimately. And Lake reminds us gently that all these deadly US inroads into the ISI’s bowels began when Kayani was heading the ISI under Pervez Musharraf who, of course, according to Lake, gave “valuable assistance” to the Americans from the presidential palace in Islamabad. (My advice to Musharraf is to defer his proposed arrival in Pakistan in January 2012 by at least one year .)
With great aplomb, Lake slips in the intriguing thought as well that Musharraf “handpicked Kayani as his replacement as Army chief shortly before stepping down from the presidency in August 2008.”
So, the ISI’s pro-American “T-Wing” was formed during Kayani’s stewardship only, which later led to the proliferation of US intelligence activity in Pakistan. In short, it is rubbish to blame Hussain Haqqani as responsible for letting in all those hundreds of CIA operatives into Pakistan by generously granting them diplomatic visas from his ambassadorial chamber in Washington. Haqqani, it seems, was efficiently following up an entire enterprise that began under Kayani.
Lake informs us that Admiral Mike Mullen, former chairman of US joint chiefs of staff, was known back in Washington among the folks as the “Kayani whisperer”. Lake writes admiringly of Mullen as “a man with a special knack for quietly and discreetly influencing Kayani at crucial points.”
Just ponder for a few minutes: Why is someone in a key position in the US security establishment in Washington deliberately slandering Kayani at this point? I think, with Haqqani gone out of the loop, with President Asif Zardari probably stepping down soon in whatever strange circumstances, there is great uneasiness bordering on panic in Washington.
It seems increasingly that Washington has no Plan B. The setback has come as an avalanche. The Pakistani military has turned the table squarely on the US and the latter needs to yet figure out how to play back into the game. By the way, Shuja Nawaz, who is known to be rather knowledgeable, also makes much the same point.
Meanwhile, someone has hinted at a warning to Kayani that he is going too far in rooting out even the last traces of the US intelligence penetration that devastated the Pakistani state structure.
The overpowering sense from Lake’s dispatch is of course how the US doesn’t hesitate to degrade the state structures of even its allies if American interests are involved. If this was the ruthless fate that visited ISI - an organisation that is considered second only to Mossad - I shudder to think what would be the case with lesser mortals like, say, we Indians who live on vegetables and fruits. At the end of the historic “defining partnership” between US and India, will anything be left of our Bharat mata? Eli Lake is here.

. By M K Bhadrakumar – December 8, 2011


Why someone is blackmailing Kayani - Indian Punchline
Reply With Quote
(#2)
Old
unknownprince
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 02:06 PM

Another great assessment by MK Bhadrakumar, except he gets one part wrong.

It is well known throughout Pakistan that the Pakistan has been supporting the US war and occupation of Afghanistan (this is also known by Karzai for he was ferreted into Afghanistan aboard American aircraft from Islamabad). There was supply routes, the Shamsi airbase. This was not a secret. The public was well aware.

So there is no real way for the US to do a character attack on Kayani. It is well known that all levels of Pakistan's government and army have been supporting the US war and occupation of Afghanistan. I mean they just shut down the supply routes- no secret there.


It is doubtful then that this latest attempt at pressuring Kayani to reverse his decisions is going to work. It has to also be realized that Imran Khan's escalating candidacy is something all are aware of. His 7-year old demands to stop all support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan may have sealed this to an end all together.


What this latest episode really reveals is that the pro US warhawks are nervous and have come to the realization that this may in fact be the end of Pakistan support for the US war and occupation. Revealing well known information will not have any effect.

Last edited by unknownprince; 12-08-2011 at 02:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
(#3)
Old
Afghanistan2010's Avatar
Afghanistan2010 Afghanistan2010 is offline
PF senior
Afghanistan2010 is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 4,921
Thanks: 2,671
Thanked 1,083 Times in 867 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Default 12-08-2011, 02:50 PM

I would make some kebab out of this dog kiyani and its generals.


High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.
Reply With Quote
(#4)
Old
Insaaf_انصاف
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 03:44 PM

Kayani, the most powerfull man of Pakistan , zardari and gilani are
Nothing
Kayani is the real president of Pakistan , he is the chief of army and ISI
HE is the threat to the peace in Afghanistan ... ... ......
Reply With Quote
(#5)
Old
sanman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 05:00 PM

Shamsi airbase is no longer even being used for US drone strikes, and that's been the case for quite some time. It's the airbases in Afghanistan which are being used to carry out drone strikes on Pakistani soil. That's why the US didn't make any noise about evacuating the Shamsi airbase, because it's no longer important for them.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Soldat_Amir (12-09-2011)
(#6)
Old
abassinafghan abassinafghan is online now
PF contributor
abassinafghan is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 1,114
Thanks: 250
Thanked 404 Times in 276 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Aug 2011
Default 12-08-2011, 05:11 PM

hahhaha

no american dollar no pakistan , its that easy .
Reply With Quote
(#7)
Old
sanman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 05:17 PM

That's true - Pakistan has only survived for past 60 years because of US support. Without that, Pakistan wouldn't have survived a month.
Reply With Quote
(#8)
Old
unknownprince
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 05:19 PM

with Zardari/Gilani out, and Imran Khan taking lead, Pakistan support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan is perhaps at its end

US-Pak ties are beyond repair at this point.

Last edited by unknownprince; 12-08-2011 at 05:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
(#9)
Old
sanman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 05:37 PM

Imran Khan is a loud maverick type of guy, and it won't take long for the military to lose patience with him. Military is only using him now, because they're desperate to see Zardari/PPP ousted. It shows what poor choices the Pak military have left for themselves. Once the flamboyant Imran Khan is in power, he will start telling everybody what to do, and military will either have to assassinate him or destroy his image through some scandal.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
(#10)
Old
unknownprince
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-08-2011, 05:45 PM

Buddy,

Bottom line is that Pakistan support for the US war, Karzai, and occupation of Afghanistan is over. Imran Khan is heeding what people want, and what the region wants.

No need to resort to hopeless and futile wishful thinking. Imran Khan got some sense. His victory is a given.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blackmailing, kayani

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




History of Pashtuns| Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki| TheHujra.com| Pukhtoogle| Afghanvoice.com| Khyber.org| Pukhto.net| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.