Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto |
World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto | > Politics & Current Affairs > Political Talk - سياسي خبرې
Reload this Page My Bipartisan Bill To Require an Afghanistan Withdrawal Timetable
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1)
Old
ghundal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default My Bipartisan Bill To Require an Afghanistan Withdrawal Timetable - 05-05-2011, 01:46 PM

Rep. Jim McGovern: Bring Them Home: My Bipartisan Bill To Require an Afghanistan Withdrawal Timetable


Today, I introduced new, bipartisan legislation to require the Obama administration to present an exit strategy for U.S. forces from Afghanistan. U.S. Rep. Walter Jones (R-NC) is the lead Republican co-sponsor.
Specifically, the bill (The "Afghanistan Exit and Accountability Act") would:
  • Require the president to transmit to Congress a plan with timeframe and completion date on the transition of U.S. military and security operations in Afghanistan to the government of Afghanistan;
  • Require the president to report quarterly (i.e. every 90 days) on the status of that transition, and the human and financial costs of remaining in Afghanistan, including increased deficit and public debt; and
  • Included in those quarterly reports, the president must disclose to Congress the savings in 5-year, 10-year and 20-year time periods were the U.S. to accelerate redeployment and conclude the transition of all U.S. military and security operations to Afghanistan within 180 days (i.e. 6 months).
My remarks from this morning's press conference on Capitol Hill are below:
As we all saw on Sunday, the men and women of our armed forces and intelligence community are incredible people. The killing of Osama bin Laden is a welcome development that makes the world a better, safer place. The question then becomes: now what? Now that bin Laden is dead and Al Qaeda is scattered around the globe, does it really make sense to keep using over 100,000 U.S. troops to occupy Afghanistan and prop up a corrupt government?
I don't think so.
I believe we must use this opportunity to re-examine our policy and to require the Administration to tell us exactly how and when we will end our massive troop presence in Afghanistan.
This morning a bipartisan group of Members introduced the Afghanistan Exit and Accountability Act.
Our bill requires the president to give Congress a concrete strategy and timeframe for bringing our servicemen and women home to their families and communities.
"It requires quarterly reports on the human and financial costs of continuing the war -- and how much we would save if we withdrew our forces within a reasonable time frame.
That's not too much to ask.
In fact, I believe it's something we owe to the men and women serving so bravely for so long in Afghanistan -- and their families.
This war is the longest in our history. There's no end in sight.
To make it worse, we're not even paying for the war. It's on the national credit card. The war in Afghanistan adds $100 billion a year -- $2 billion each week, $8 billion each month -- to our debt.
We're told that we can't afford vital domestic funding, but we should continue to borrow billions and billions of dollars for nation-building in Afghanistan. That's nuts. Instead, we should be doing some more nation-building right here at home.
On Monday, the Pentagon reported that 1,550 American troops have died in Afghanistan. Last week, another one of my constituents was killed. Tens of thousands more have been wounded. Our soldiers and their families are the only ones being asked to sacrifice. The rest of us are asked to do nothing.
Enough is enough.
The president told us that we will see a substantial drawdown of troops in July. He needs to keep that promise. And he needs to tell us when all of our troops will be coming home, and how much it will keep costing the American people - in sacrificed lives, wounded bodies and minds, and U.S. tax dollars - until this war is finally over.
That's what our bill would require.
One final point. For too long, Congress has ducked its proper oversight responsibilities when it comes to the war in Afghanistan. We've avoided meaningful debate and discussion and have chosen to simply "go along to get along."
Today we -- in a bipartisan way -- plan to force an end to that pattern. We will utilize every opportunity available to us to end that inexcusable indifference.
Reply With Quote
(#2)
Old
ghundal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 05-05-2011, 01:48 PM

Lawmakers to President Obama: Get Out of Afghanistan

May 05, 2011 1:06 PM
PrintRSS
Share:
Email

More
FarkTechnoratiGoogleLiveMy Space
NewsvineRedditDeliciousMixxYahoo


ABC News’ John R. Parkinson reports:
With the corpse of Public Enemy No. 1 now submerged on the floor of the Arabian Sea, a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced new legislation in the House of Representatives today to require the Obama administration to present an exit strategy for all U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
After Navy SEALs killed Osama bin Laden Sunday and with just an estimated 100 members of al Qaeda remaining in Afghanistan, Rep. James McGovern, the chief architect of the legislation, asked rhetorically whether “it really make sense to keep using over 100,000 U.S. troops to occupy Afghanistan and prop up a corrupt government?”
“We must use this opportunity to re-examine our policy and to require the administration to tell us exactly how and when we will end our massive troop presence in Afghanistan,” McGovern, D-Mass., said. “Our bill requires the president to give Congress a concrete strategy and timeframe for bringing our servicemen and women home to their families and communities where they belong.”
The bill would require President Obama to transmit to Congress a plan with a timeframe and completion date on the transition of U.S. military and security operations in Afghanistan to the Karzai government, establish a quarterly report from the president on the status of the transition and the cost of remaining in Afghanistan, including increased deficit and public debt, and would oblige the administration to disclose to Congress any savings should the U.S. accelerate redeployment to conclude the transition of operations within six months.
The current plan from the White House would begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan this July, and transition security to the Afghan government in 2014, but the lawmakers are pressing the president for an extensive decrease and a plan to eventually bring all troops home, not just a token withdrawal of a few thousand troops this summer.
“The president told us that we will see a substantial drawdown of troops in July. He needs to keep that promise, and he needs to tell us when all of our troops will be coming home, and how much it will keep costing the American people – in sacrificed lives, wounded bodies and minds, and U.S. tax dollars – until this war is finally over,” McGovern said. “For too long, Congress has ducked its proper oversight responsibilities when it comes to the war in Afghanistan. We’ve avoided meaningful debate and discussion and have chosen to simply ‘go along to get along.’ Today we – in a bipartisan way – plan to force an end to that pattern. We will utilize every opportunity available to us to end that inexcusable indifference.”
Rep. Walter Jones, R-North Carolina, touched on a similar question asked by John Kerry when he testified before Congress decades ago on the Vietnam War by quoting a retired Marine general’s email.
“What do we say to the mother and father, the wife of the last Marine killed to support a corrupt government and a corrupt leader?” Jones quoted from the general’s letter.
“It is time for the American people to demand from the United States Congress that we get behind Mr. McGovern’s bill and we start a process to bring our troops home from Afghanistan,” Jones said.
McGovern and Jones say they are lining up bipartisan support for the measure, including the backing of seven House Republicans including Reps. Jason Chaffetz, Jimmy Duncan, Ron Paul, Tim Johnson, Justin Amash, and Roscoe Barlette. Nine Democrats have signed on as original cosponsors as well.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said she was unsure about the details that McGovern’s bill specifically called for, but signaled the commitment of U.S. troops in Afghanistan should not be open-ended – a message she took to the Afghan president when she visited the region in March.
“I do know that the American people want us to draw [troop levels] down. I don't know that -- how much of an impact the death of Osama bin Laden has. He's a person; he's a symbol,” Pelosi said. “It isn't an end to the threat to our national security, and that's how we have to make the judgment. But again, my message to the president of Afghanistan and to others that I met was: This is -- this has to come to an end.”
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
afghanistan, bill, bipartisan, require, timetable, withdrawal

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki| TheHujra.com| Pukhtoogle| Afghanvoice.com| Khyber.org| Pukhto.net| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.