Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto |
World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   Pashtun Community | Pashtuns | Pashto | > Politics & Current Affairs > Development - سپما او پرمختګ
Reload this Page The Creation of an Afghan Internment Regime and the Divide over U.S. Detention Power
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,505
Thanks: 107
Thanked 264 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default The Creation of an Afghan Internment Regime and the Divide over U.S. Detention Power - 09-06-2012, 09:39 PM

http://www.soros.org/reports/remakin...etention-power

Reports

Remaking Bagram: The Creation of an Afghan Internment Regime and the Divide over U.S. Detention Power
September 6, 2012 Regional Policy Initiative on Afghanistan & Pakistan







Remaking Bagram: The Creation of an Afghan Internment Regime and the Divide over U.S. Detention Power













Download Files



Remaking Bagram
Download the complete 35-page report in English
466.03 KB pdf









Remaking Bagram
Download the complete 29-page report in Dari
1.29 MB pdf









Remaking Bagram
Download the complete 37-page report in Pashto
1.38 MB pdf










This report by the Open Society Foundations highlights concerns about the transition of the U.S. detention facility in Bagram, Afghanistan, from U.S. to Afghan control. Remaking Bagram exposes a deep divide between U.S. and Afghan officials on the eve of the planned handover that puts U.S. intentions to maintain detention authority in Afghanistan against the Afghan government’s insistence that Afghans can no longer be detained by the United States on “Afghan soil.” Remaking Bagram also highlights the Afghan government’s efforts to take custody of detainees held by the United States by creating an Afghan internment regime that would detain individuals without trial. Many Afghan legal experts call this new system unconstitutional and have expressed fears that it is susceptible to abuse.
Reply With Quote
(#2)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,505
Thanks: 107
Thanked 264 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 09-06-2012, 09:40 PM

the Soros report is available on PDF.

This is the bloodshed/torture of Pashtuns for such projects as New Kabul City...

But it will never last.
Reply With Quote
(#3)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,505
Thanks: 107
Thanked 264 Times in 238 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 09-06-2012, 09:42 PM

Kabul, Afghanistan—The U.S. and Afghan governments remain divided on the eve of what some expected to be the complete handover of the U.S. run detention center in Afghanistan on September 9th. Since the signing of an agreement in March, the United States has continued to capture and detain Afghans in Bagram, and expects to retain this authority until 2014.
“We cannot allow allies and friendly countries to have detention centers here. This is illegal,” said Afghanistan’s national security advisor Rangin Dadfar Spanta.
U.S. authorities interpret the handover deal differently: “The March 9, 2012, Detentions MOU does not limit the authority of U.S. forces to capture and detain the enemy,” said one official.
The continued tensions over U.S. detention power in Afghanistan have been documented in a new report from the Open Society Foundations, Remaking Bagram: The Creation of an Afghan Internment Regime and the Divide over U.S. Detention.
Open Society Foundations researchers found that despite the March agreement, the United States has sent approximately 600 new detainees to Bagram in the last six months. They also intend to retain detention capacity in two blocks in Bagram, later transferring detainees to the Afghan authorities.
Remaking Bagram also highlights how the March agreement fails to address the problem of non-Afghan detainees, or “third country nationals,” who could remain in U.S. custody for the foreseeable future—raising the troubling specter of another Guantanamo Bay in Afghanistan.
In order to receive the transferred detainees, the Afghan government has created a system of detention without trial, or internment, which closely resembles the U.S. system in Bagram. Senior Afghan officials told the Open Society Foundations that Afghanistan’s internment regime is unconstitutional.
“The U.S. military wants to keep its foot in the door of Bagram, and they’ve been avoiding Afghan demands for sovereignty in order to do so,” said Rachel Reid, senior advisor on Afghanistan at the Open Society Foundations. “But if Afghanistan truly wants to bring legitimacy to national security detentions, creating their own unlawful internment regime is a bad way to start.”
The Afghan government is already holding more than 50 Afghans in internment. While some Afghan officials have said that internment will end with the transition in September, other officials have said it is here to stay, raising fears about how this power may be used in the future.
“Consider the fact that even our regular laws are ignored by powerful people,” Abdul Qawi Afzali of the Legal Aid Organization Afghanistan cautioned, “What will happen when you give them the actual, legal power to detain people like this law does?”
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
afghan, creation, detention, divide, internment, power, regime

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki| TheHujra.com| Pukhtoogle| Afghanvoice.com| Khyber.org| Pukhto.net| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.