Originally Posted by RevolutionThroughReason

reallly it wasn't because of laziness and internal corruption that lead to Europeans overunning them?

Originally Posted by FlounderingWithImpunity.

i don't feel like being mean at the moment so i will save the "skip a stair and break a hip" comment for some other time but i would like you to remind you of the fact that by the tender age of 64, you should have picked up on a few causes other than just awareness on the after effects of uranium and india for a hobby. you beat the **** out of that point. move on to something else now.

i am going to ignore you now.

Originally Posted by RevolutionThroughReason

You doubt it, I thought you knew things certainly, you're light years ahead of science and can read minds and also barely stop yourself from crapping your pants

Originally Posted by Afghanistan2010

DZJ,you did not understand the topic,i too alittle agree that faye belittle science with the uranium ammunition but there are many benefits and negatives of science and scientific findings,which were abused by the common people.
Some turned about it into extrem a good example to be brainwashed is RTR here,he tries to make his point through insults and accusations not in a mature way,a mad dog....

Originally Posted by faye

oh, lol, we're down to the poopoo hole now. you got a thing about poopoo holes, haven't you dear.
has anybody changed your nappy recently? freudian slips keep dripping out of you, dear boy.

Originally Posted by RevolutionThroughReason

all of a sudden? No I always endorsed the theory of evolution and there has ALWAYS been a narrative which depicts some type of evolutionary process

let's get one thing straight ..Ibn Khaldun while present some type of evolutionay hypothesis isn't presenting the currently accepted Evolutionary Theory

the significance of Ibn khaldun's statement is that Muslims EVEN EARLY on had a more practical and attempted a more naturalistic understanding of how the world around them worked rather than BLIND Belief that Bread-Mole, EMKhan and 2010 and their child Molesting Heroes try to preach. That he developed a hypothesis that attempted to understand nature THROUGH Nature, his assessment is flawed but for an Early Attempt ...it was good. We can learn from the ATTEMPT and know that if Ibn Khaldun could be a prominent Muslim and embrace the rigors of science and analytical knowledge, So can we.