World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   "Pull out your swords and slay anyone that says Pashtun and Afghan are not one! Arabs know this and so do Romans: Afghans are Pashtuns, Pashtuns are Afghans!" -Khushal Khattak > >
Reload this Page Imran ends Nato plans for Afghanistan: WP
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#1)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,735
Thanks: 121
Thanked 292 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default Imran ends Nato plans for Afghanistan: WP - 01-07-2014, 10:00 AM

Imran Khan, a Pakistani provincial leader, complicates NATO plans for Afghanistan - The Washington Post
Imran complicates Nato plans for Afghanistan: WP
Imran complicates Nato plans for Afghanistan: WP

January 06, 2014
INP



WASHINGTON - For years, American officials have tried to persuade Pakistan’s military chiefs and prime ministers to cooperate with US-led war plans in neighboring Afghanistan. But now it is a politician in a far-flung province who is standing in the way. Imran Khan, an Oxford-educated millionaire, leads an effort to shut down supply routes to Afghanistan.
Angered by US drone strikes, Imran has effectively halted Nato convoys through northwest Pakistan, a vital crossing point for trucks carrying supplies to and from landlocked Afghanistan, Washington Post in a report said on Sunday.
Khan’s party controls the local government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which Nato convoys must pass through to reach the northern border crossing. After US drone strikes in Pakistan this fall, the 61-year-old politician called on his supporters to block the transit routes in protest. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s government has appeared powerless to stop him.
In a blunt signal of the coalition’s unease, about 20 diplomats from Nato countries, including the United States, summoned Imran for dinner in early December at the German ambassador’s residence in Islamabad. According to Imran and others present, the encounter became tense.
“They kept saying, ‘Look, we have nothing to do with it; it’s all the CIA’?” carrying out the drone attacks, Imran recalled. “I said, ‘Look, you are all coalition partners.’ “
At one point, Imran said, he asked the European diplomats how they would feel if Pakistan started secretly killing people living in their countries who were wanted on warrants in Pakistan. Even some conservative religious politicians question Imran’s strategy. “He is providing an excuse to the US to remain on Afghanistan’s soil,” said Abdul Jalil Jan, a leader of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Sami party in Kyber Pakhunkhwa. But on a recent visit by a reporter to protest camps near Peshawar, party workers chanted ‘Long live Imran Khan’ as they waited to quiz the next round of truck drivers on their cargo.
With Sharif and Pakistan’s military vowing that the supply routes must remain open, Imran’s campaign is a remarkable show of defiance in a country that has been under military rule for more than half of its 67-year history.
A self-described liberal pacifist, Imran shows no sign of backing down. He says that although U.S. drone strikes may be aimed at violent militants, many wind up killing innocent civilians and fuel terrorism by angering the local population.
“The reason we are taking this stand is to tell the US, “Okay, it’s fine to protect American lives, but how can you sacrifice a whole country for it?’?” Imran said in a recent interview at his mountaintop estate on the outskirts of Islamabad.
The attacks also violate Pakistan’s sovereignty, Imran says, and he notes that the Pakistani army is bearing the brunt of the retaliatory strikes from militants. Imran became a media sensation because of his perceived appeal to progressive younger voters and urbanites, tens of thousands of whom would show up at his campaign rallies. His past reputation as a playboy, as well as his marriage to and divorce from socialite Jemima Goldsmith, daughter of British billionaire James Goldsmith, added to his mystique.
Khan had been warning for months that he and his party would seek to cut off NATO supply routes if the U.S. drone strikes didn’t end. The U.S. military says the land routes, used by civilian contractors, are a quick and cost-effective way to remove its vast store of equipment and hardware from landlocked Afghanistan ahead of the departure of most troops next year. When the drone attacks continued this fall, including a November strike in Kyber Pakhtunkhwa, Imran and thousands of others held a day-long protest on a highway used by Nato convoys on the outskirts of the province’s capital, Peshawar.
When reports reached Kabul and Washington that some Nato truck drivers were being roughed up by protesters, the coalition suspended its convoys through the northern border crossing. Coalition military commanders in Kabul and US Embassy officials in Islamabad have sought to play down the disruption, noting that Nato supplies are still moving through Pakistan’s southern province of Balochistan.
But Khan’s party says it also has plans to blockade the port in the southern Pakistani city of Karachi, which would be a dramatic escalation. And there are growing signs that U.S. and NATO officials consider Khan’s stance to be far more than just an annoyance.
When US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel visited Pakistan in early December, he warned that the country could lose billions of dollars in US military aid if the blockade continued, according to US and Pakistani media accounts. Two weeks later, Marine Gen Joseph F Dunford Jr., commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan, traveled to Islamabad to meet with new military chief, Lt-Gen Raheel Sharif.

Last edited by Shah-i-Kot; 01-07-2014 at 10:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#2)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,735
Thanks: 121
Thanked 292 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 01-07-2014, 10:04 AM

Imran Khan, a Pakistani provincial leader, complicates NATO plans for Afghanistan - The Washington Post
By Tim Craig



ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — For years, American officials have tried to persuade Pakistan’s military chiefs and prime ministers to cooperate with U.S.-led war plans in neighboring Afghanistan.
But now it is a politician in a far-flung province who is standing in the way.
Angered by U.S. drone strikes, Imran Khan has effectively halted NATO convoys through northwest Pakistan, a vital crossing point for trucks carrying supplies to and from landlocked Afghanistan.
Khan, an Oxford-educated millionaire and former cricket star, has no real power in the national government. But his party controls the local government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which NATO convoys must pass through to reach the northern border crossing.
After U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan this fall, the 61-year-old politician called on his supporters to block the transit routes in protest. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s government has appeared powerless to stop him.
With Sharif and Pakistan’s military vowing that the supply routes must remain open, Khan’s campaign is a remarkable show of defiance in a country that has been under military rule for more than half of its 67-year history.
A self-described liberal pacifist who became more attuned to his Muslim faith after his globe-trotting cricket career ended, Khan shows no sign of backing down. He says that although U.S. drone strikes may be aimed at violent militants, many wind up killing innocent civilians and fuel terrorism by angering the local population.
“The reason we are taking this stand is to tell the U.S., ‘Okay, it’s fine to protect American lives, but how can you sacrifice a whole country for it?’ ” Khan said in a recent interview at his mountaintop estate on the outskirts of Islamabad.
The attacks also violate Pakistan’s sovereignty, Khan says, and he notes that the Pakistani army is bearing the brunt of the retaliatory strikes from Islamist militants.
But Khan is drawing fierce criticism from some Pakistanis who accuse him of using the issue for political gain. Khan, a member of Parliament, unsuccessfully sought the prime minister’s job in elections last year.
Rifaat S. Hussain, a defense and political analyst in Islamabad, said Khan has become a “one-man show” who “has yet to mature into a statesman.”
“Many of us had hoped, now that elections are over, he would have focused on local issues, corruption, law and order, terrorism, but instead he is trying to play to the peanut gallery,” Hussain said.
Honing his focus
Khan ended his two-decade-long cricket career in 1992, after leading Pakistan’s national team to its only World Cup victory. He then became a philanthropist and founded his party, Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), or Movement for Justice.
Though it struggled for years to win seats in Parliament, Khan emerged as a leading contender in Pakistan’s national elections.
He became a media sensation because of his perceived appeal to progressive younger voters and urbanites, tens of thousands of whom would show up at his campaign rallies. His past reputation as a playboy — as well as his marriage to and divorce from socialite Jemima Goldsmith, daughter of British billionaire James Goldsmith — added to his mystique.
But Khan’s party finished third in the elections.
Khan had been warning for months that he and his party would seek to cut off NATO supply routes if the U.S. drone strikes didn’t end. The U.S. military says the land routes, used by civilian contractors, are a quick and cost-effective way to remove its vast store of equipment and hardware from landlocked Afghanistan ahead of the departure of most troops next year.
When the drone attacks continued this fall, including a November strike in Kyber Pakhtunkhwa, Khan and thousands of others held a day-long protest on a highway used by NATO convoys on the outskirts of the province’s capital, Peshawar. The following day, Nov. 24, his party’s political and municipal workers erected checkpoints to search and turn back trucks suspected of carrying NATO supplies.
When reports reached Kabul and Washington that some NATO truck drivers were being roughed up by protesters, the coalition suspended its convoys through the northern border crossing.
Coalition military commanders in Kabul and U.S. Embassy officials in Islamabad have sought to play down the disruption, noting that NATO supplies are still moving through Pakistan’s southern province of Baluchistan.
But Khan’s party says it also has plans to blockade the port in the southern Pakistani city of Karachi, which would be a dramatic escalation. And there are growing signs that U.S. and NATO officials consider Khan’s stance to be far more than just an annoyance.
When U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel visited Pakistan in early December, he warned that the country could lose billions of dollars in U.S. military aid if the blockade continued, according to U.S. and Pakistani media accounts. Two weeks later, Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan, traveled to Islamabad to meet with Pakistan’s new military chief, Lt. Gen. Raheel Sharif.
In a blunt signal of the coalition’s unease, about 20 diplomats from NATO countries, including the United States, summoned Khan for dinner in early December at the German ambassador’s residence in Islamabad. According to Khan and others present, the encounter became tense.
“They kept saying, ‘Look, we have nothing to do with it; it’s all the CIA’ ” carrying out the drone attacks, Khan recalled. “I said, ‘Look, you are all coalition partners.’ ”
At one point, Khan said, he asked the European diplomats how they would feel if Pakistan started secretly killing people living in their countries who were wanted on warrants in Pakistan.
Critics in government
Sharif’s government is starting to increase its criticism of Khan, who is also holding a series of demonstrations against Sharif’s economic policies and rising inflation.
Information Minister Pervez Rasheed accused Khan of being a demagogue “trying to divert the attention of people from his failures” in his province.
“It is the right of every individual to protest, but the way PTI has blocked NATO supplies, it will create problems for the country at an international level,” Rasheed said in an interview.
Even some conservative religious politicians question Khan’s strategy.
“He is providing an excuse to the U.S. to remain on Afghanistan’s soil,” said Abdul Jalil Jan, a leader of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Sami party in Kyber Pakhunkhwa.
But on a recent visit by a reporter to protest camps near Peshawar, party workers chanted “Long live Imran Khan” as they waited to quiz the next round of truck drivers on their cargo.

Haq Nawaz Khan in Peshawar, Shaiq Hussain in Islamabad and Craig Whitlock in Washington contributed to this report.
Reply With Quote
(#3)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,735
Thanks: 121
Thanked 292 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 01-07-2014, 10:14 AM

"But Khan’s party says it also has plans to blockade the port in the southern Pakistani city of Karachi, which would be a dramatic escalation. And there are growing signs that U.S. and NATO officials consider Khan’s stance to be far more than just an annoyance."

"Khan’s party controls the local government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which Nato convoys must pass through to reach the northern border crossing. After US drone strikes in Pakistan this fall, the 61-year-old politician called on his supporters to block the transit routes in protest. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s government has appeared powerless to stop him.
In a blunt signal of the coalition’s unease, about 20 diplomats from Nato countries, including the United States, summoned Imran for dinner in early December at the German ambassador’s residence in Islamabad. According to Imran and others present, the encounter became tense.
“They kept saying, ‘Look, we have nothing to do with it; it’s all the CIA’?” carrying out the drone attacks, Imran recalled. “I said, ‘Look, you are all coalition partners.’ “
At one point, Imran said, he asked the European diplomats how they would feel if Pakistan started secretly killing people living in their countries who were wanted on warrants in Pakistan


"Khan had been warning for months that he and his party would seek to cut off NATO supply routes if the U.S. drone strikes didn’t end. The U.S. military says the land routes, used by civilian contractors, are a quick and cost-effective way to remove its vast store of equipment and hardware from landlocked Afghanistan ahead of the departure of most troops next year.
"
Reply With Quote
(#4)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,735
Thanks: 121
Thanked 292 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 01-07-2014, 10:18 AM

The KP government/PTI have not just 'complicated' NATO's plans for Afghanistan, but effectively put an end to it. Without the NATO supply lines from Pakistan, this US/NATO war is not possible. The US/NATO exit is going to be financially expensive via northern distribution network.

Last edited by Shah-i-Kot; 01-07-2014 at 10:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#5)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,735
Thanks: 121
Thanked 292 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 01-09-2014, 01:07 AM

discuss
Reply With Quote
(#6)
Old
ډګروال's Avatar
ډګروال ډګروال is offline
PF senior
ډګروال is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,650
Thanks: 587
Thanked 618 Times in 494 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Default 01-09-2014, 12:44 PM

imran khan is the "pashtun" face of punjab.

his intentions for stopping the supply route might be good along with his anti drone strike protest.

but

he is very dangerous for pukhtunkhwa as he will attempt to incorporate Pashtuns into mainstream paki culture. Pashto language and culture will suffer alot.

again we should blame the pashtun nationalist parties who failed to protest and supported war against pashtuns.


Reply With Quote
(#7)
Old
Shah-i-Kot Shah-i-Kot is offline
PF senior
Shah-i-Kot is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 2,735
Thanks: 121
Thanked 292 Times in 265 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Default 01-09-2014, 11:54 PM

[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ډګروال View Post
imran khan is the "pashtun" face of punjab.

his intentions for stopping the supply route might be good along with his anti drone strike protest.
Stopping the NATO supplies ends the US/NATO war in Afghanistan. I dont recall ANP/QWP ever deciding to stop the NATO supplies. (QWP actually makes money out of NATO supplies along with Pak military) You call these Pashtun nationalists?


Quote:
but

he is very dangerous for pukhtunkhwa as he will attempt to incorporate Pashtuns into mainstream paki culture. Pashto language and culture will suffer alot.
Can you explain the basis of your opinion?

Has he said he is going to remove Pashto from school syllabus and replace it with Urdu only? Or replace attan with the bhangra? I dont think so bro. Neither the PTI nor Imran Khan have ever claimed to be a Pashtuncentric party. However, they have not said they are going to erase Pashto.

I consider this narrative to be garbage Red Hat propaganda in order to distract people from the disaster of their positions (supporting drone attacks and Pak military operations in FATA/KP- the US/NATO war in Afghanistan). What a track record!


They changed the name of the Northwestern Frontier Province to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province. Is that an accomplishment? Did that help the people?




Quote:
again we should blame the pashtun nationalist parties who failed to protest and supported war against pashtuns.
Pashtun nationalists? Which ones?


They are now claiming that their main goal is to protect Pashto language, but what use is this if Pashtuns are being killed on a daily basis?

Their policy of protecting Pashto is all a joke. They speak/write Pashto, but dont live Pashto.

Justifying drone attacks, supporting Pak military operations, and supporting the US/NATO war in Afghanistan are not representative of nationalists. They are anything but Pashtun nationalists. There is no historical record which shows a 'nationalist' of any nation/ethnic supporting war on their own people.

Lastly, I dont think the most pressing concern for Pashtuns in Afghanistan/KP/FATA is the Pashto language, but to survive and live peacefully with independence. To be left alone. The US/NATO war made possible by Pakistan is the barrier to peace and prosperity. Once there is peace and prosperity, then people will have to comfort to think about other important matters.

Last edited by Shah-i-Kot; 01-10-2014 at 12:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
afghanistan, ends, imran, nato, plans

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




History of Pashtuns| Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki| TheHujra.com| Pukhtoogle| Afghan MP3| Khyber.org| Pukhto.net| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.