World's Largest Online Pashtun Community

Go Back   "Pull out your swords and slay anyone that says Pashtun and Afghan are not one! Arabs know this and so do Romans: Afghans are Pashtuns, Pashtuns are Afghans!" -Khushal Khattak > > >
Reload this Page Atheists Vs Muslims
User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
(#111)
Old
faye faye is offline
PF senior
faye is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 9,671
Thanks: 7,334
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,448 Posts
My Mood: Breezy
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: australia
Default 12-28-2011, 06:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozymandias View Post
No, why would you think that? Who else would you ask about the natural world, and the laws that govern it? A teacher? they get their knowledge from the scientists.

You have many people for company. Many reject reality and substitute their own.

Yes, like you said. Granted, their knowledge is less limited than most, and collectively, they are responsible for all knowledge this race have obtained.
there is such a thing as observation and personal experience .

whose reality? i accept your version of reality, in, that you have it. but my idea of what is reality, is bigger than yours you are also my company, ozmosis.

now, now, ozmosis. you are getting carried away here. are you telling us now, that there was no knowledge, previous to scientists coming to conclusions, with what was supplied to them, by our creator? ie, brain,thoughts, geometry, energy etc.

Last edited by faye; 12-29-2011 at 08:03 AM. Reason: spacing
Reply With Quote
(#112)
Old
Afghanistan2010's Avatar
Afghanistan2010 Afghanistan2010 is offline
PF senior
Afghanistan2010 is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 4,921
Thanks: 2,561
Thanked 1,068 Times in 853 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Default 12-29-2011, 05:46 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by faye View Post
isn't the big bang/expansion still occouring?
if something from nothing is not supernatural, then what is?
what would you consider to be 'supernatural'?

His answer is always natural laws,but asked about natural laws he is unable to answer them,who brought these natural laws into the laws we observe.

we do not believe in magic as you think ,you are misunderstanding what we mean about supernatural.

If i ask you and scientists where does the mass come from which the Big Bang caused no one can answer them,and if i ask you how can two mountains (example) crash and can bring such perfect forms like that we observe in our universe.


by mathematical thinking the theory of example is flawed because you can't say 2= 1 or 0=1 without making mathematical errors like dividing zero or similar.


0< from nothing became 1 < something.

You are just ignorant and as you all other people about the fact that Jesus (pbuh) healed blind , brought dead people into life ( unexplainable).
Muhammad (pbuh) explained things in all matters with the revelation of Allah ( God ) the most high,he explained things you were some years ago unaware of them and you can search in the books of greeks and romans you will not find anything similar.And even if you find anything similar the one by the greeks and romans will be flawed.


It were your forefathers who believed in Angels and characterized them into females ( where Angel do not have any sex),they were the one who believed God has beard and old guy over the clouds,and that the Earth is flatt.





High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.
Reply With Quote
(#113)
Old
ozymandias's Avatar
ozymandias ozymandias is offline
PF contributor
ozymandias is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 1,465
Thanks: 85
Thanked 88 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Default 12-29-2011, 11:42 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by faye View Post
there is such a thing as observation and personal experience .
Let's stay on topic here. You asked who defines natural laws. If you are using your observations and personal experience to define natural laws, that pretty much makes you a scientist, in practice, if not in career.

Quote:

whose reality? i accept your version of reality, in, that you have it. but my idea of what is reality, is bigger than yours you are also my company, ozmosis.
You are welcome to reject reality, and pretend your fictional reality is 'bigger' than the real one. I won't stop you.

Quote:

now, now, ozmosis. you are getting carried away here. are you telling us now, that there was no knowledge, previous to scientists coming to conclusions, with what was supplied to them, by our creator? ie, brain,thoughts, geometry, energy etc.
Since nothing was 'supplied by a creator', someone had to be the first to discover every fact known to man -- and since discovering facts loosely makes someone a scientist, yes -- that is exactly what I am saying. I am not talking a career scientist, who makes a living doing research, but anyone that studies the world -- in the loosest definition of scientist -- exactly the same definition used by you when you asked if scientists are the ones defining the natural laws.


-------------------------------------------------

"There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
(I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)
Reply With Quote
(#114)
Old
ozymandias's Avatar
ozymandias ozymandias is offline
PF contributor
ozymandias is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 1,465
Thanks: 85
Thanked 88 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Default 12-29-2011, 11:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Afghanistan2010 View Post
His answer is always natural laws,but asked about natural laws he is unable to answer them,who brought these natural laws into the laws we observe.
I've answered this repeatedly. Just because you ignore my answer, and insist there must be a 'someone' behind them does not mean there is. The answer is 'no one'.

Quote:

we do not believe in magic as you think
By definition, if you are religious, you believe in magic and the supernatural -- and I am not talking stage magic, but true Harry Potter style magic.

Quote:

,you are misunderstanding what we mean about supernatural.

If i ask you and scientists where does the mass come from which the Big Bang caused no one can answer them,
Once again, just because you ignore their answers does not mean they have no answer.

Quote:

and if i ask you how can two mountains (example) crash and can bring such perfect forms like that we observe in our universe.
What are you even talking about? Geology is well understood these days.

Quote:


by mathematical thinking the theory of example is flawed because you can't say 2= 1 or 0=1 without making mathematical errors like dividing zero or similar.
Huh? What are you trying to say?

Quote:

0< from nothing became 1 < something.
Huh? What are you trying to say?

Quote:

You are just ignorant and as you all other people about the fact that Jesus (pbuh) healed blind , brought dead people into life ( unexplainable).
Also historically not factual. There is no proof that these events actually occurred.

Quote:


Muhammad (pbuh) explained things in all matters with the revelation of Allah ( God ) the most high,he explained things you were some years ago unaware of them and you can search in the books of greeks and romans you will not find anything similar.
Oh? Like what? A classic example muslims like to drag out is embroyology -- which not only did mohammad get wrong -- he copied from prior sources. Cosmology? Also wrong -- and also plagiarized. Geology? Wrong, and copied. What specifically are you talking about?

Quote:

And even if you find anything similar the one by the greeks and romans will be flawed.
Indeed -- exactly like the copies in the koran are wrong and flawed.

Quote:

It were your forefathers who believed in Angels and characterized them into females ( where Angel do not have any sex),they were the one who believed God has beard and old guy over the clouds,and that the Earth is flatt.
Huh? What does the fictional gender of a mythical creature even matter?

Quote:





-------------------------------------------------

"There was so much to grok, so little to grok from. "

"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh C'thulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn"

أنا آسف ، أنا لا أقرأ أو لا يتكلم اللغة العربية. وسوف تبذل جهدا لترجمة مع ترجمة جوجل. يرجى أن يكون فهم من هذا الحاجز.
(I'm sorry, I do not read or speak Arabic. I will make an effort to translate with Google translate. Please be understanding of this barrier.)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ozymandias For This Useful Post:
Soldat_Amir (12-29-2011)
(#115)
Old
Soldat_Amir's Avatar
Soldat_Amir Soldat_Amir is offline
PF contributor
Soldat_Amir is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 1,548
Thanks: 479
Thanked 545 Times in 364 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Sep 2011
Default 12-29-2011, 11:57 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozymandias View Post
I've answered this repeatedly. Just because you ignore my answer, and insist there must be a 'someone' behind them does not mean there is. The answer is 'no one'.



By definition, if you are religious, you believe in magic and the supernatural -- and I am not talking stage magic, but true Harry Potter style magic.



Once again, just because you ignore their answers does not mean they have no answer.



What are you even talking about? Geology is well understood these days.



Huh? What are you trying to say?



Huh? What are you trying to say?



Also historically not factual. There is no proof that these events actually occurred.



Oh? Like what? A classic example muslims like to drag out is embroyology -- which not only did mohammad get wrong -- he copied from prior sources. Cosmology? Also wrong -- and also plagiarized. Geology? Wrong, and copied. What specifically are you talking about?



Indeed -- exactly like the copies in the koran are wrong and flawed.



Huh? What does the fictional gender of a mythical creature even matter?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Soldat_Amir For This Useful Post:
ozymandias (12-29-2011)
(#116)
Old
Afghanistan2010's Avatar
Afghanistan2010 Afghanistan2010 is offline
PF senior
Afghanistan2010 is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 4,921
Thanks: 2,561
Thanked 1,068 Times in 853 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Default 12-29-2011, 01:48 PM

Imran Khan PTI is a hypocrite - YouTube

lol


High achievement always takes place in the framework of high expectation.
Reply With Quote
(#117)
Old
faye faye is offline
PF senior
faye is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 9,671
Thanks: 7,334
Thanked 1,766 Times in 1,448 Posts
My Mood: Breezy
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: australia
Default 12-29-2011, 06:49 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ozymandias View Post
Let's stay on topic here. You asked who defines natural laws. If you are using your observations and personal experience to define natural laws, that pretty much makes you a scientist, in practice, if not in career.

You are welcome to reject reality, and pretend your fictional reality is 'bigger' than the real one. I won't stop you.

Since nothing was 'supplied by a creator', someone had to be the first to discover every fact known to man -- and since discovering facts loosely makes someone a scientist, yes -- that is exactly what I am saying. I am not talking a career scientist, who makes a living doing research, but anyone that studies the world -- in the loosest definition of scientist -- exactly the same definition used by you when you asked if scientists are the ones defining the natural laws.
yas boss. i try to keep to topic.
so eg; a farmer who through his observations and personal experiences, makes conclusions about the workings of nature or the native peoples who learned of the medicinal benefits of plants, are scientists. i didn't know this.

do you have any proof that my 'supposed', by your DEFINITION, 'fictional' reality is in fact 'fictional' and that it is mere 'pretense?

we agree on that then. the creator created nothing from which was manifested something. ie; the big scrunch or the big bang....we are not sure yet what was manifested first.
Reply With Quote
(#118)
Old
Asli
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Default 12-29-2011, 07:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldat_Amir View Post
I wonder what you look like.

Secondly go ahead refute that embrology video oh wait you couldnt.
off with your fairy tales
What is there to refute? The person does not refute the Quran, he is questioning where Muhammad (s) got the info from?

The person is questioning the language of the Quran, and thus questioning Arabic grammar.

The whole video is based in and around how to interpret the language used. Nothing more and nothing less. The person himself claims not to be a biologist. So, he is playing the semantics.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Manzareh (12-29-2011)
(#119)
Old
Manzareh's Avatar
Manzareh Manzareh is online now
Lion of PF
Manzareh is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 5,111
Thanks: 1,686
Thanked 1,770 Times in 1,228 Posts
My Mood: Amused
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In the lab
Default 12-29-2011, 07:44 PM

how can you judge the language of the Quraan when you dont speak or understand the language used in the Qur'aan? - you cant, you cant even translate the Quran into any language the closest you can get is a transliteration of the words used. iv been learning Fusha Arabic for only 12 weeks and i can say im truly amazed, infact im certain somebody that had some knowledge of the language used in the Qur'aan would be able to grasp how unique the Qur'aan is, its definitely miraculous.


----------

*You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Manzareh For This Useful Post:
Afghanistan2010 (12-30-2011)
(#120)
Old
Manzareh's Avatar
Manzareh Manzareh is online now
Lion of PF
Manzareh is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 5,111
Thanks: 1,686
Thanked 1,770 Times in 1,228 Posts
My Mood: Amused
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: In the lab
Default 12-29-2011, 07:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldat_Amir View Post
I wonder what you look like.

Secondly go ahead refute that embrology video oh wait you couldnt.
off with your fairy tales
what fairy tales?


----------

*You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
atheists, muslims

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




History of Pashtuns| Learn Pashto Online| Afghan Wiki| TheHujra.com| Pukhtoogle| Afghan MP3| Khyber.org| Pukhto.net| Tor_Khan's blog| Abdul Rahman Karim's blog| Voices of the Pashtun land| Pashto TV

Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.31 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.6 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2016 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
No part of this site may be copied without permission of the administration. The views, posts, opinions and threads expressed by members of the community here are not necessarily those of the staff and management of Pashtun Forums.